首页> 外文期刊>Cognitive Neurodynamics >A comparison study of two P300 speller paradigms for brain-computer interface
【24h】

A comparison study of two P300 speller paradigms for brain-computer interface

机译:两种P300拼写范例对人机界面的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, a comparison of two existing P300 spellers is conducted. In the first speller, the visual stimuli of characters are presented in a single character (SC) paradigm and each button corresponding to a character flashes individually in a random order. The second speller is based on a region-based (RB) paradigm. In the first level, all characters are grouped and each button corresponding to a group flashes individually in a random order. Once a group is selected, the characters in it will appear on the flashing buttons of the second level for the selection of desired character. In a spelling experiment involving 12 subjects, higher online accuracy was obtained on the RB paradigmbased P300 speller than the SC paradigm-based P300 speller. Furthermore, we analyzed P300 detection performance, the P300 waveforms and Fisher ratios using the data collected by the two spellers. It was found that the stimuli display paradigm of the RB speller enhances P300 potential and is more suitable for P300 detection.
机译:在本文中,对两个现有的P300拼写器进行了比较。在第一个拼写器中,以单个字符(SC)范例显示字符的视觉刺激,并且对应于字符的每个按钮以随机顺序分别闪烁。第二个拼写器基于基于区域的(RB)范例。在第一级中,将所有字符分组,并且对应于组的每个按钮以随机顺序分别闪烁。一旦选择了一个组,其中的字符将出现在第二级的闪烁按钮上,以选择所需的字符。在涉及12个主题的拼写实验中,基于RB范式的P300拼写器获得的在线准确性高于基于SC范式的P300拼写器。此外,我们使用两个拼写者收集的数据分析了P300的检测性能,P300波形和Fisher比率。已发现,RB拼写器的刺激显示范例可增强P300的潜力,更适合于P300的检测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号