首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Development Economics >Is informal risk-sharing less effective for the poor? Risk externalities and moral hazard in mutual insurance
【24h】

Is informal risk-sharing less effective for the poor? Risk externalities and moral hazard in mutual insurance

机译:非正式的风险分担对穷人是否有效?相互保险中的风险外部性和道德风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Poor farm-households are less keen to adopt high risk/high return technologies than rich households. Yet, the poor are more vulnerable to income shocks. We develop a model of endogenous risk-taking to explain these facts. In autarky, poor households adopt less risky production plans and obtain lower expected returns, but face higher relative risk than the rich. The introduction of risk-sharing generates negative risk externalities between agents. At the first best, the social planner imposes a homogeneous level of risk-taking in the group. At the second best, risk-taking is not enforceable and increases with insurance, generating moral hazard. Interestingly, the poor's risk-taking behavior is more sensitive to insurance. The social planner thus mitigates risk-taking by applying a lower insurance coverage in poor groups. The introduction of risk-sharing therefore reinforces the gap between rich and poor in terms of expected income and absolute risk, while the effect on relative risk is ambiguous. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:贫穷的农户不如富有的家庭热衷于采用高风险/高回报的技术。但是,穷人更容易受到收入冲击的影响。我们建立了一个内生风险承担模型来解释这些事实。在自给自足中,贫困家庭采用的生产计划风险较低,预期收益较低,但相对风险却高于富裕家庭。风险共担的引入在代理商之间产生了负面的风险外部性。最好的情况是,社会计划者会在小组中施加同等程度的冒险精神。第二,冒险是不可强制执行的,并且随着保险的增加而增加,产生道德风险。有趣的是,穷人的冒险行为对保险更加敏感。因此,社会计划者通过为贫困群体提供较低的保险范围来减轻冒险行为。因此,风险分担的引入加剧了贫富之间在预期收入和绝对风险方面的差距,而对相对风险的影响却模棱两可。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号