...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Development Economics >Offshoring and intellectual property rights reform
【24h】

Offshoring and intellectual property rights reform

机译:离岸和知识产权改革

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper empirically assesses the responsiveness of US offshoring to intellectual property rights (IPR) reforms in 16 countries. We construct a measure of US offshoring at the industry level based on trade in intermediate goods, covering 23 industries for the period 1973-2006. For each industry, we differentiate between broad offshoring and intra-industry offshoring activities. We conduct a difference-in-difference analysis using the IPR reform years proposed in Branstetter et al. (2006, QuarterlyJournal of Economics). We find that following IPR reform, neither broad nor intra-industry ofFshoring intensities change for the typical US industry at conventional levels of significance. However, high-tech (patent-sensitive) industries substantially expand their intra-industry offshoring activities, whereas low-tech (patent-insensitive) industries do not change their intra-industry offshoring activities in a statistically significant way. In addition, high-tech industries increase their broad offshoring relative to low-tech industries, but the effects are smaller and less robust than those estimated for intra-industry offshoring.
机译:本文根据经验评估了美国离岸外包对16个国家/地区的知识产权(IPR)改革的反应。我们基于中间产品贸易在行业级别构建了美国离岸外包的衡量标准,涵盖了1973-2006年期间的23个行业。对于每个行业,我们区分广泛的离岸外包活动和行业内的离岸外包活动。我们使用Branstetter等人提出的IPR改革年进行差异分析。 (2006年,《经济学季刊》)。我们发现,在进行了知识产权改革之后,对于典型的美国行业而言,传统意义上的Fshoring强度的广泛或产业内变化都不会改变。但是,高科技(对专利敏感的)行业极大地扩展了其在产业内的离岸外包活动,而低技术(对专利不敏感的)行业却没有以统计学上显着的方式改变其在产业内的离岸外包活动。另外,相对于低技术产业,高科技产业增加了其广泛的离岸外包,但是其影响比行业内离岸外包的估计要小,而且效果不强。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号