...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research >Cementless femoral prostheses cost more to implant than cemented femoral prostheses.
【24h】

Cementless femoral prostheses cost more to implant than cemented femoral prostheses.

机译:与非骨水泥股骨假体相比,非骨水泥股骨假体的植入成本更高。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Prosthetic cost contributes greatly to the overall expense of THA. A key question, therefore, in the selection of implant technique is whether any price difference exists between a cementless and a cemented femoral prosthesis. We evaluated the price difference between the most commonly used cemented and cementless femoral stems at three high-volume academic medical centers. Each hospital's costs for prostheses from the manufacturers were recorded. The average cost of implanting a cementless femoral prosthesis was Dollars 296 more than the average cost of implanting a cemented femoral stem, even with the additional expense of two batches of bone cement and the accessories commonly used to achieve a third-generation cementing technique. The price difference was less variable if the cost of the prostheses from only the primary implant supplier for each institution was considered. As the number of THAs performed per year continues to escalate, implantation of a cemented femoral component remains an attractive method of fixation from an economic standpoint. Level of Evidence: Level III, economic and decision analysis. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
机译:假肢费用对THA的总费用有很大贡献。因此,在选择植入技术时,一个关键问题是非骨水泥和骨水泥股骨假体之间是否存在任何价格差异。我们在三个大型学术医学中心评估了最常用的骨水泥和非骨水泥股骨柄之间的价格差异。记录每家医院制造商的假肢费用。植入非骨水泥股骨假体的平均成本比植入骨水泥股骨干的平均成本高296美元,即使增加了两批骨水泥和通常用于实现第三代骨水泥技术的附件的费用。如果仅考虑每个机构的主要植入物供应商的假体成本,则价格差异变化较小。随着每年进行的THA的数量不断增加,从经济的角度考虑,植入股骨骨水泥组件仍然是一种有吸引力的固定方法。证据级别:III级,经济和决策分析。有关证据水平的完整说明,请参见《作者指南》。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号