首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Optical Society of America, A. Optics, image science, and vision >Comparison of four analytic methods for the calculation of irradiance in integrating spheres
【24h】

Comparison of four analytic methods for the calculation of irradiance in integrating spheres

机译:积分球辐照度计算的四种解析方法比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The relative merits of four methods-energy balance, summation of reflections, inversion of the irradiance-transfer matrix, and solution of the integral equation-are compared by using each to determine irradiance in a multizone true sphere and in a sphere with a flat port; in the process several new solutions are presented. Although limited in applicability, the energy-balance method is by far the most direct. For the flat-port configuration the relationships among various published expressions are established; furthermore, the curved-surface interreflection irradiance is shown to be nonuniform when the initial irradiance is restricted to a part of the curved surface. (C) 1998 Optical Society of America [S0740-3232(98)01712-8]. [References: 17]
机译:通过使用每种方法确定多区域真实球体和平坦端口球体中的辐照度,比较了四种方法的相对优点:能量平衡,反射之和,辐照度传递矩阵的求逆和积分方程的解。 ;在此过程中,提出了几种新的解决方案。尽管适用性受到限制,但能量平衡方法是迄今为止最直接的方法。对于平面端口配置,建立了各种已发布表达式之间的关系;此外,当初始辐照度限于曲面的一部分时,曲面间反射辐照度显示为不均匀。 (C)1998年美国眼镜学会[S0740-3232(98)01712-8]。 [参考:17]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号