首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Psychological Science >Rumination and Worry in Daily Life: Examining the Naturalistic Validity of Theoretical Constructs
【24h】

Rumination and Worry in Daily Life: Examining the Naturalistic Validity of Theoretical Constructs

机译:日常生活中的反省和忧虑:检验理论建构的自然主义有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Rumination and worry, two forms of perseverative thinking, hold promise as core processes that transect depressive and anxiety disorders. Whereas previous studies have been limited to the laboratory or to single diagnoses, we used an experience sampling methodology to assess and validate rumination and worry as transdiagnostic phenomena in the daily lives of individuals diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and co-occurring MDD-GAD. Clinical and healthy control participants carried a handheld electronic device for one week. Eight times per day they reported on their current levels of rumination and worry and their theoretically postulated features: thought unpleasantness, repetitiveness, abstractness, uncontrollability, temporal orientation, and content, and overall senses of certainty and control. Both rumination and worry emerged as transdiagnostic processes that cut across MDD, GAD, and MDD-GAD. Furthermore, most psychological theories concerning rumination and worry strongly mapped onto participants' reports, providing the first naturalistic validation of these constructs.
机译:反思和忧虑是两种坚持性思考的形式,它们有望成为横渡抑郁症和焦虑症的核心过程。尽管以前的研究仅限于实验室或单一诊断,但我们使用了一种经验抽样方法来评估和验证经诊断为重度抑郁症(MDD),广泛性焦虑症(GAD)的个体在日常生活中的转诊和反省现象),以及同时出现的MDD-GAD。临床和健康对照参与者携带手持电子设备一周。他们每天八次报告其当前的沉思和忧虑水平及其理论上假定的特征:思想上的不愉快,重复性,抽象性,不可控制性,时间取向和内容以及整体的确定性和控制感。跨越MDD,GAD和MDD-GAD的跨诊断过程出现了沉思和忧虑。此外,大多数有关反省和担忧的心理学理论都强烈地映射到参与者的报告中,为这些构造提供了首次自然主义的验证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号