首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Optical Society of America, A. Optics, image science, and vision >Scalar integral diffraction methods: unification, accuracy, and comparison with a rigorous boundary element method with application to diffractive cylindrical lenses
【24h】

Scalar integral diffraction methods: unification, accuracy, and comparison with a rigorous boundary element method with application to diffractive cylindrical lenses

机译:标量积分衍射方法:统一,准确,并与严格的边界元方法进行比较,应用于衍射圆柱透镜

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Various integral diffraction methods are systematically unified into a single framework, clearly illustrating the interconnections among the numerous scaler and rigorous formulations. This hierarchical depiction of the integral methods makes clear the specific approximations inherent in each integral method. The scaler methods are compared in detail with a rigorous open-region formulation of the boundary element method (BEM). The rigorous BEM provides a reference method for accurately determining the diffracted fields for both TE and TM incidence. The rigorous BEM and the various scalar methods are then applied to the case of focusing of normally incident plane waves by diffractive cylindrical lenses with f-numbers ranging from f/2 to f/0.5. From the diffracted-field calculations, a number of performance metrics are determined including focal spot size, diffraction efficiency, reflected and transmitted powers, and focal-plane sidelobe power. The quantitative evaluation of the performance of the scalar methods with these metrics allows the establishment, for the first time, of the region of validity of the various scaler methods for this application. As expected, the accuracy of the scalar methods decreases as the f-number of the diffractive lenses is reduced. Additionally, some metrics, particularly the focal-plane sidelobe power, appear to be particularly sensitive to the approximations in the scaler methods, and as a result their accuracy is significantly degraded. (C) 1998 Optical Society of America. [References: 30]
机译:各种积分衍射方法被系统地统一到一个框架中,清楚地说明了众多定标器和严格配方之间的相互联系。积分方法的这种层次描述清楚地表明了每种积分方法固有的特定近似值。将缩放器方法与边界元素方法(BEM)的严格开放区域公式进行了详细比较。严格的边界元法为准确确定TE和TM入射角的衍射场提供了参考方法。然后将严格的BEM和各种标量方法应用于f值在f / 2到f / 0.5范围内的衍射柱面透镜聚焦法向入射平面波的情况。从衍射场计算中,可以确定许多性能指标,包括焦斑大小,衍射效率,反射和透射功率以及焦平面旁瓣功率。使用这些指标对标量方法的性能进行定量评估,首次可以确定针对该应用的各种定标器方法的有效范围。不出所料,标量方法的精度随着衍射透镜的f值的减小而降低。另外,某些度量,尤其是焦平面旁瓣功率,似乎对缩放器方法中的近似值特别敏感,结果,它们的准确性会大大降低。 (C)1998年美国眼镜学会。 [参考:30]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号