【24h】

Two models for partially coherent imaging

机译:两种用于部分相干成像的模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper discusses the physical difference between two image formation approaches for partially coherent imaging. In one approach, the pupil function is shifted according to illumination condition as in the transmission cross coefficient (TCC) approach, whereas in the other approach, the object spectrum is shifted. Although the two approaches result in identical images, they are built on distinct physical models. Eigenfunction analysis reveals that the TCC approach is built on an artificial optical model only for image calculation. Therefore, the two approaches are not interchangeable except for image calculation. Such an example is found in calculating the entropy in an imaging system.
机译:本文讨论了部分相干成像的两种成像方法之间的物理差异。在一种方法中,像透射交叉系数(TCC)方法中那样,光瞳函数根据照明条件发生偏移,而在另一种方法中,对象光谱发生偏移。尽管这两种方法产生的图像相同,但是它们是建立在不同的物理模型上的。本征函数分析表明,TCC方法仅基于人工光学模型进行图像计算。因此,除了图像计算之外,这两种方法不可互换。在计算成像系统中的熵时发现了这样的例子。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号