...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research >The acetabular wall index for assessing anteroposterior femoral head coverage in symptomatic patients
【24h】

The acetabular wall index for assessing anteroposterior femoral head coverage in symptomatic patients

机译:髋臼壁指数用于评估有症状患者的股骨头前后覆盖

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Understanding acetabular pathomorphology is necessary to correctly treat patients with hip complaints. Existing radiographic parameters classify acetabular coverage as deficient, normal, or excessive but fail to quantify contributions of anterior and posterior wall coverage. A simple, reproducible, and valid measurement of anterior and posterior wall coverage in patients with hip pain would be a clinically useful tool. Questions/Purposes: We (1) introduce the anterior wall index (AWI) and posterior wall index (PWI), (2) report the intra- and interobserver reliability of these measurements, and (3) validate these measurements against an established computer model. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 87 hips (63 patients) with symptomatic hip disease. A validated computer model was used to determine total anterior and posterior acetabular coverage (TAC and TPC) on an AP pelvis radiograph. Two independent observers measured the AWI and PWI on each film, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated. Pearson correlation was used to determine the strength of linear dependence between our measurements and the computer model. Results: Intra- and interobserver ICCs were 0.94 and 0.99 for the AWI and 0.81 and 0.97 for the PWI. For validation against the computer model, Pearson r values were 0.837 (AWI versus TAC) and 0.895 (PWI versus TPC). Mean AWI and PWI were 0.28 and 0.81 for dysplastic hips, 0.41 and 0.91 for normal hips, 0.61 and 1.15 for hipswith a deep acetabulum. Conclusions: Our data suggest these measures will be helpful in evaluating anterior and posterior coverage before and after surgery but need to be evaluated in asymptomatic individuals without hip abnormalities to establish normal ranges. Level of Evidence: Level III, diagnostic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
机译:背景:了解髋臼病理形态对于正确治疗髋关节疾病患者是必要的。现有的放射学参数将髋臼覆盖度分类为不足,正常或过度,但无法量化前壁和后壁覆盖度的贡献。对髋部疼痛患者进行前壁和后壁覆盖率的简单,可重复且有效的测量将是临床上有用的工具。问题/目的:我们(1)介绍前壁指数(AWI)和后壁指数(PWI),(2)报告这些测量值在观察者内和观察者之间的可靠性,并且(3)根据已建立的计算机模型验证这些测量值。方法:我们回顾性分析了87例有症状的髋部疾病的髋部(63例患者)。经过验证的计算机模型用于确定AP骨盆X线照片上的髋臼总前部和后部(TAC和TPC)。两名独立的观察者测量了每部电影的AWI和PWI,并计算了组内相关系数(ICC)。皮尔逊相关性用于确定我们的测量值与计算机模型之间的线性相关性强度。结果:观察者内和观察者间ICC对于AWI分别为0.94和0.99,对于PWI为0.81和0.97。为了针对计算机模型进行验证,Pearson r值分别为0.837(AWI与TAC)和0.895(PWI与TPC)。发育不良的髋关节的平均AWI和PWI为0.28和0.81,正常髋关节的平均AWI和PWI为0.41和0.91,髋臼深的髋关节的平均AWI和PWI为0.61和1.15。结论:我们的数据表明这些措施将有助于评估手术前后的前后覆盖率,但需要对无髋关节异常的无症状患者进行评估,以建立正常范围。证据级别:III级,诊断研究。有关证据水平的完整说明,请参见《作者说明》。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号