...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Swine Health and Production >Comparison of nursery pig behavior assessed using human observation and digital-image evaluation methodologies
【24h】

Comparison of nursery pig behavior assessed using human observation and digital-image evaluation methodologies

机译:使用人类观察和数字图像评估方法评估的保育猪行为比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: To design and implement a digital photograph system to document the pig response to a human observer in the home pen and then compare these results to a human observation in an approach-assessment paradigm. Materials and methods: An observer entered the nursery pen and crouched down with an outstretched arm for 15 seconds. A digital image was recorded, and the observer counted all pigs touching, oriented, and not oriented to the human. Each digital image was used to determine the snout and tail-base proximity to the index finger of the observer for pigs classified as Touch, Oriented, and Not Oriented when pens were divided into thirds and quarters. Postures and behaviors of pigs classified as Not Oriented were further delineated. Human observation and digital image were compared. Results: Most Not Oriented pigs in the digital image were standing, followed by sitting, with 2.5% piling. Both snout and tail-base proximities were closer for Touch pigs than for the other categories (P<.001). Regardless of how pens were divided, more pigs were located in the section farthest from the observer. There were no differences (P>.05) between human observation and digital-image evaluation for pigs classified as Touch. More pigs were classified as Oriented and fewer as Not Oriented for digital-image evaluation (P<.001). Implication: Human observation is a faster and practical application, but digital-image evaluation allows for more information to be collected.
机译:目标:设计和实现数字照片系统​​,以记录猪对家用钢笔中的人类观察者的反应,然后将这些结果与人类评估方法进行比较。材料和方法:观察者进入苗圃笔,伸出的胳膊蹲下15秒钟。记录了数字图像,观察者计数了所有与人接触,定向和非定向的猪。当将笔分为三分之二和四分之三时,每个数字图像都用于确定观察者的食指的鼻子和尾巴与尾巴的接近度,这些猪被分为触摸,定向和非定向。进一步描述了分类为“未定向”的猪的姿势和行为。人体观察和数字图像进行了比较。结果:数字图像中大多数未定向的猪都站着,然后坐着,成桩率为2.5%。与其他类别的猪相比,Touch猪的口鼻部和尾巴基部邻近度都更近(P <.001)。无论笔如何分割,在距观察者最远的区域中都放置了更多的猪。观察到的猪与数字图像评估猪之间的接触没有差异(P> .05)。为了进行数字图像评估,更多的猪被归类为“定向”,较少的猪为“未定向”(P <.001)。含义:人工观察是一种更快且实用的应用程序,但是数字图像评估可以收集更多的信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号