首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Indian Medical Association. >A comprehensive evaluation of rationality of cough and cold medicines available in Indian market
【24h】

A comprehensive evaluation of rationality of cough and cold medicines available in Indian market

机译:全面评估印度市场上咳嗽和感冒药的合理性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To analyse various cough and cold formulations available in the Indian market and to study their pharmacological rationale and cost effectiveness, a cross-sectional, observational study was carried out for evaluation of the drugs listed in Current Index of Medical Specialities (CIMS) India, September 2010.The formulations were assessed for their total number, type of dosage form, number of constituents in each formulation, their pharmacological group and rationality. The total daily cost and its association with type of dosage form was analysed. Out of a total 1297 preparations evaluated, 94% were fixed dose combination. The mean number of constituents was 3.20±1.03. Liquid oral formulations were largest in number (64.4%). The formulations contained various antitussives (30.30%), expectorants (33.92%), antihistamines (71.09%), mucolytics (35.62%), decongestants (56.28%), bronchodilators (16.81%) and analgesics/antipyretics (31.30%). None of the preparation was listed in the Model list of Essential Medicines, WHO(March 2011) under section 25 of "Medicines acting on the respiratory tract". Only 2% of the preparations had pharmacological rationale for their use in cough and common cold; 9.6% were containing more than one ingredient of the same pharmacological group and 6.85% were containing both antitussive and expectorant having opposing action. Highest number of preparations(36.85%) was having cost of therapy of Rs 6-10 per day. Liquid oral dosage forms had significantly higher cost than solid dosage form (p<0.0001) and topical nasal dosage forms had significantly higher cost than liquid (p<0.03) and solid (p<0.001) dosage forms. It is conducted that various cough and cold medicines available in Indian market lacked therapeutic rationale for their use, leading to wasteful expenditure.
机译:为了分析印度市场上各种咳嗽和感冒药,并研究其药理学原理和成本效益,我们进行了横断面观察性研究,以评估印度《 9月医疗专科指数》(CIMS)中列出的药物。 2010.对制剂的总数,剂型类型,每种制剂中的成分数量,药理组和合理性进行了评估。分析了每日总费用及其与剂型类型的关系。在总共评估的1297种制剂中,有94%是固定剂量组合。平均成分数为3.20±1.03。液体口服制剂的数量最多(64.4%)。该制剂包含各种镇咳药(30.30%),祛痰药(33.92%),抗组胺药(71.09%),粘液溶解药(35.62%),充血药(56.28%),支气管扩张药(16.81%)和镇痛药/退热药(31.30%)。世卫组织基本药物标准清单(2011年3月)在“作用于呼吸道的药物”第25节中未列出任何制剂。只有2%的制剂具有用于咳嗽和感冒的药理学原理; 9.6%的药物含有同一药理学成分的一种以上,而6.85%的镇咳药和祛痰药均具有相反的作用。最高数量的制剂(36.85%)的治疗费用每天为Rs 6-10。液体口服剂型的成本显着高于固体剂型(p <0.0001),局部鼻用剂型的成本显着高于液体剂型(p <0.03)和固体剂型(p <0.001)。据指出,印度市场上出售的各种咳嗽和感冒药缺乏使用的治疗依据,导致浪费的支出。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号