首页> 外文期刊>Clinical oral investigations >Efficacy of stabilization splints for the management of patients with masticatory muscle pain: a qualitative systematic review.
【24h】

Efficacy of stabilization splints for the management of patients with masticatory muscle pain: a qualitative systematic review.

机译:稳定夹板对咀嚼性肌痛患者的治疗效果:定性的系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study aimed at providing an answer to two clinical questions related to patients with masticatory muscle pain: 1) Does the use of a full-coverage hard acrylic occlusal appliance (stabilization splint) lead to a significant decrease of symptoms? and 2) Is the treatment success achieved with a stabilization splint more pronounced than the success attained with other forms of treatment (including placebo treatment) or no treatment? A systematic search was carried out in different electronic databases, supplemented by handsearch in four selected dental journals and by examination of the bibliographies of the retrieved articles. Thirteen publications, representing nine controlled clinical studies, could be identified. Reporting quality of most studies as assessed with the Jadad score ranged from 1 to 5. Based on the currently best available evidence it appears that most patients with masticatory muscle pain are helped by the incorporation of a stabilization splint. Nevertheless, evidence is equivocal if improvement of pain symptoms after incorporation of the intraoral appliance is caused by a specific effect of the appliance. A stabilization splint does not appear to yield a better clinical outcome than a soft splint, a non-occluding palatal splint, physical therapy, or body acupuncture. The scarcity of current external evidence emphasizes the need for more and better clinical research.
机译:这项研究旨在为与咀嚼性肌肉疼痛患者有关的两个临床问题提供答案:1)使用全覆盖硬质丙烯酸咬合器(稳定夹板)是否可显着减轻症状? 2)用稳定夹板获得的治疗成功是否比其他形式的治疗(包括安慰剂治疗)或没有治疗获得的成功更为明显?在不同的电子数据库中进行了系统的搜索,此外还对四种选定的牙科期刊进行了手工搜索,并对检索到的文献的书目进行了检查。可以确定代表13个对照临床研究的13个出版物。用Jadad评分评估的大多数研究的报告质量范围为1至5。根据目前可获得的最佳证据,看来大多数咀嚼型肌痛患者可通过并入稳定夹板来获得帮助。但是,如果口腔内矫治器并入后疼痛症状的改善是由矫治器的特定作用引起的,则证据是模棱两可的。稳定的夹板似乎没有比软的夹板,不阻塞的pa板夹板,物理疗法或针刺法产生更好的临床结果。当前外部证据的稀缺性强调需要更多和更好的临床研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号