...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Medical Library Association : >The effect of training on question formulation among public health practitioners: results from a randomized controlled trial.
【24h】

The effect of training on question formulation among public health practitioners: results from a randomized controlled trial.

机译:培训对公共卫生从业人员提出问题的影响:来自随机对照试验的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To improve understanding of the information-seeking behaviors of public health professionals, the authors conducted this randomized controlled trial involving sixty participants to determine whether library and informatics training, with an emphasis on PubMed searching skills, increased the frequency and sophistication of participants' practice-related questions. METHODS: The intervention group (n = 34) received evidence-based public health library and informatics training first, whereas the control group (n = 26) received identical training two weeks later. The frequency and sophistication of the questions generated by both intervention and control groups during the interim two-week period served as the basis for comparison. RESULTS: The intervention group reported an average of almost 1.8 times more questions than those reported by the control group (1.24 vs. 0.69 questions per participant); however, this difference did not reach statistical significance. The intervention group overall produced more sophisticated (foreground) questions than the control group (18 vs. 9); however, this difference also did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The training provided in the current study seemed to prompt public health practitioners to identify and articulate questions more often. Training appears to create the necessary precondition for increased information-seeking behavior among public health professionals.
机译:目的:为增进对公共卫生专业人员的信息寻求行为的了解,作者进行了这项涉及60名参与者的随机对照试验,以确定是否侧重于PubMed搜索技能的图书馆和信息学培训,从而增加了参与者的搜索频率和复杂程度与练习有关的问题。方法:干预组(n = 34)首先接受了循证公共卫生图书馆和信息学培训,而对照组(n = 26)则在两周后接受了相同的培训。在两周的过渡期内,干预组和对照组所产生问题的频率和复杂程度是进行比较的基础。结果:干预组报告的问题平均比对照组报告的问题高出近1.8倍(每位参与者1.24比0.69)。但是,这种差异没有达到统计学意义。与对照组相比,干预组总体上提出了更复杂的(前景)问题(18 vs. 9)。但是,这种差异也没有达到统计学意义。结论:本研究提供的培训似乎促使公共卫生从业人员更频繁地发现和阐明问题。培训似乎为增加公共卫生专业人员之间的信息寻求行为创造了必要的前提。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号