首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Neurological Sciences: Official Bulletin of the World Federation of Neurology >Cervical carotid artery: The most dependable alternative for the detection of a right-to-left shunt with transcranial Doppler in patients with insufficient temporal acoustic bone windows?
【24h】

Cervical carotid artery: The most dependable alternative for the detection of a right-to-left shunt with transcranial Doppler in patients with insufficient temporal acoustic bone windows?

机译:颈颈动脉:对于颞部声学骨窗不足的患者,经颅多普勒从右向左分流的检测最可靠的替代方法?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We are glad to respond to the very interesting commentaries on our paper by Dr Topcuoglu in his letter 《Cervical carotid artery may be the most dependable alternative place for detection of patent foramen ovale with contrast transcranial Doppler in patients with insufficient temporal sonic bone window 》. He refers, as in other letters in similar circumstances, to their interesting pioneering study in which they very nicely demonstrate the utility of submandibular internal carotid artery (ICA) contrast M-mode power Doppler ultrasound recording for the detection of right-to-left shunts (RLS). They found in 2 of 24 examined internal carotid arteries low volume RLS signals which were not found in the transtemporal middle cerebral artery (MCA) but which they could track into the anterior cerebral artery (ACA). Moreover, they found in patients in whom RLS could be demonstrated, more bubbles in the ICA than in the MCA. These findings offer indeed the submandibular ICA as an alternative in patients with insufficient temporal bone window, similar to otheralternatives such as our transforaminal approach, or vertebrobasilar recordings, or even more peripheral arteries such as the contralateral brachial or femoral arteries. However, whether the submandibular ICA approach is the most dependable, as Dr Topcuoglu suggests, remains an open question since the different alternatives have still not been directly compared. Moreover, our own experience with the submandibular ICA approach asks for caution since there are difficulties with breathing and swallowing artefacts.
机译:我们很高兴对Topcuoglu博士在其论文中发表的有趣的评论作出回应,在他的信《颈椎动脉可能是颞下音速骨窗不足的患者中,采用对比经颅多普勒检查卵圆孔未闭的最可靠替代方法》。与其他类似情况下的来信一样,他提到他们有趣的开创性研究,他们很好地证明了颌下颈内动脉(ICA)对比M型功率多普勒超声记录在检测从右到左分流中的作用(RLS)。他们在检查的24个颈内动脉中有2个发现了较小的RLS信号,这些信号在颞颞中脑动脉(MCA)中找不到,但可以追踪到大脑前动脉(ACA)中。而且,他们发现在可以证实RLS的患者中,ICA中的气泡比MCA中的气泡多。这些发现确实为颞骨骨窗不足的患者提供了下颌ICA的替代方案,类似于其他替代方案,例如我们的经椎间孔入路或椎基底动脉记录,甚至更多的外周动脉,例如对侧肱动脉或股动脉。然而,正如Topcuoglu博士所建议的那样,下颌下ICA方法是否最可靠仍然是一个悬而未决的问题,因为尚未直接比较不同的替代方法。此外,由于呼吸和吞咽伪影很困难,我们自己在下颌下ICA方法上的经验也需要谨慎。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号