首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the National Cancer Institute >Detecting Overall Survival Benefit Derived From Survival Postprogression Rather Than Progression-Free Survival
【24h】

Detecting Overall Survival Benefit Derived From Survival Postprogression Rather Than Progression-Free Survival

机译:检测源自进行后的生存而不是无进展生存的总体生存效益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Broglio and Berry (2009) examined the impact of survival postprogression (SPP) on overall survival (OS) when progression-free survival (PFS) was used to assess treatment effect in metastatic cancer. Their simulation studies found no statistical difference in OS because of dilution effect from SPP, although there was a statistical difference in PFS between treatment arms. Recently, two phase III clinical trials showed efficacy of experimental treatments in OS, but not PFS. These results seem counterintuitive, because it may be reasonable to consider that the effect of treatment in prolonging PFS can influence OS prolongation. We conducted simulations to examine the role of SPP in OS under the assumption that only SPP, and not PFS, differed between treatment arms. We also explored the impact of patient heterogeneity on the OS analysis. Our study offers a reasonable explanation for the two phase III trials and recommends further discussion of PFS as an adequate endpoint and what role SPP might play in OS to evaluate current treatment regimens.
机译:Broglio和Berry(2009)研究了无进展生存期(PFS)评估转移癌的治疗效果时,进展后生存期(SPP)对总体生存期(OS)的影响。他们的模拟研究发现,尽管SPP之间存在统计学差异,但由于SPP的稀释作用,OS差异无统计学意义。最近,两项III期临床试验表明OS可以进行实验性治疗,而PFS则不能。这些结果似乎违反直觉,因为认为延长PFS的治疗效果可能影响OS延长可能是合理的。我们进行了模拟,以检查SPP在OS中的作用,假设治疗组之间只有SPP而不是PFS有所不同。我们还探讨了患者异质性对OS分析的影响。我们的研究为两项III期试验提供了合理的解释,并建议进一步讨论PFS作为适当的终点,以及SPP在OS中可能起何种作用以评估当前的治疗方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号