...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the National Cancer Institute >Effect of rising chemotherapy costs on the cost savings of colorectal cancer screening.
【24h】

Effect of rising chemotherapy costs on the cost savings of colorectal cancer screening.

机译:化疗费用上升对大肠癌筛查成本节省的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Although colorectal cancer screening is cost-effective, it requires a considerable net investment by governments or insurance companies. If screening was cost saving, governments and insurance companies might be more inclined to invest in colorectal cancer screening programs. We examined whether colorectal cancer screening would become cost saving with the widespread use of the newer, more expensive chemotherapies. METHODS: We used the MISCAN-Colon microsimulation model to assess whether widespread use of new chemotherapies would affect the treatment savings of colorectal cancer screening in the general population. We considered three scenarios for chemotherapy use: the past, the present, and the near future. We assumed that survival improved and treatment costs for patients diagnosed with advanced stages of colorectal cancer increased over the scenarios. Screening strategies considered were annual guaiac fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), annual immunochemical FOBT, sigmoidoscopy every 5 years, colonoscopy every 10 years, and the combination of sigmoidoscopy every 5 years and annual guaiac FOBT. Analyses were conducted from the perspective of the health-care system for a cohort of 50-year-old individuals who were at average risk of colorectal cancer and were screened with 100% adherence from age 50 years to age 80 years and followed up until death. RESULTS: Compared with no screening, the treatment savings from preventing advanced colorectal cancer and colorectal cancer deaths by screening more than doubled with the widespread use of new chemotherapies. The lifetime average treatment savings were larger than the lifetime average screening costs for screening with Hemoccult II, immunochemical FOBT, sigmoidoscopy, and the combination of sigmoidoscopy and Hemoccult II (average savings vs costs per individual in the population: Hemoccult II, Dollars 1398 vs Dollars 859; immunochemical FOBT, Dollars 1756 vs Dollars 1565; sigmoidoscopy, Dollars 1706 vs Dollars 1575; sigmoidoscopy and Hemoccult II Dollars 1931 vs Dollars 1878). Colonoscopy did not become cost saving, but the total net costs of this strategy decreased from Dollars 1317 to Dollars 296 per individual in the population. CONCLUSIONS: With the increase in chemotherapy costs for advanced colorectal cancer, most colorectal cancer screening strategies have become cost saving. As a consequence, screening is a desirable approach not only to reduce colorectal cancer incidence and mortality but also to control the costs of colorectal cancer treatment.
机译:背景:尽管进行大肠癌筛查具有成本效益,但它需要政府或保险公司进行大量的净投资。如果筛查可以节省成本,则政府和保险公司可能更倾向于投资于大肠癌筛查计划。我们研究了结直肠癌筛查是否会随着新型,更昂贵的化学疗法的广泛使用而节省成本。方法:我们使用MISCAN-Colon微观模拟模型来评估新化学疗法的广泛使用是否会影响普通人群大肠癌筛查的治疗节省。我们考虑了三种化学疗法方案:过去,现在和不久的将来。我们假设在这种情况下,生存期得到了改善,诊断为大肠癌晚期的患者的治疗费用也有所增加。所考虑的筛查策略是每年进行愈创木脂粪便隐血测试(FOBT),每年进行免疫化学FOBT,每5年进行乙状结肠镜检查,每10年进行结肠镜检查,每5年进行乙状结肠镜检查和每年的愈创木瓜FOBT。从卫生保健系统的角度对一组50岁的人群进行了分析,这些人群处于大肠癌的平均风险中,并从50岁到80岁接受100%依从性筛查,并随访直至死亡。结果:与不进行筛查相比,通过广泛使用新的化学疗法,通过筛查来预防晚期大肠癌和大肠癌死亡的治疗费用节省了两倍以上。终生平均治疗节省的费用大于用Hemoccult II,免疫化学FOBT,乙状结肠镜以及乙状结肠镜和Hemoccult II组合进行筛查时的终生平均筛查成本(平均节省与人群中每个人的成本:Hemoccult II,1398美元对美元859;免疫化学FOBT,1756年美元对1565美元;乙状结肠镜检查,1706年美元对1575美元;乙状结肠镜和Hemoccult II美元1931年对美元1878)。结肠镜检查并没有节省成本,但是此策略的总净成本从每人总人口的1317美元减少到296美元。结论:随着晚期大肠癌化疗费用的增加,大多数大肠癌筛查策略已节省成本。因此,筛查不仅是减少结直肠癌的发病率和死亡率,而且是控制结直肠癌治疗费用的一种理想方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号