...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the National Cancer Institute >Human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervical cancer screening in low-resource settings.
【24h】

Human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervical cancer screening in low-resource settings.

机译:人类乳头瘤病毒DNA检测在资源贫乏地区进行子宫颈癌筛查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: In many low-resource settings, there are barriers to cytologic screening for cervical cancer. This study evaluates human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing as an alternative screening method. METHODS: Cervical samples from 2944 previously unscreened South African women aged 35-65 years were tested for high-risk types of HPV with the use of the Hybrid Capture I (HCI) assay. Women also had a Pap smear, direct visual inspection of the cervix, and Cervicography(TM). Women positive on any screening test were referred for colposcopy. Samples from women with biopsy-confirmed, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) (n = 95), high-grade SILs (n = 74), or invasive cervical cancer (n = 12) and a random sample of women with no cervical disease (n = 243) were retested for HPV DNA with the use of the more sensitive Hybrid Capture II (HCII) assay. All P values are two-sided. RESULTS: High-risk HPV DNA was detected in 73.3% and 88.4% of 86 women with high-grade SIL or invasive cancer and in 12.2% of 2680 and 18.1% of 243 women without evidence of cervical disease, with the use of the HCI and HCII assays, respectively. HPV DNA testing with the HCII assay was more sensitive than cytology for detecting high-grade SIL and invasive cancer (McNemar's test, P =.04), and testing with the HCI assay was of equivalent sensitivity (P =.61). Cytology had a statistically significantly better specificity (96.8%) than either the HCI assay (87.8%) or the HCII assay (81.9%) (P<.01). Receiver operating characteristic curves identified test cutoff values that allow HPV DNA testing to identify 57% of women with high-grade SIL or cancer, while classifying less than 5% of women with no cervical disease as HPV DNA positive. CONCLUSIONS: HPV DNA testing has a sensitivity equivalent to, or better than, that of cytology. Since HPV DNA testing programs may be easier to implement than cytologic screening, HPV testing should be considered for primary cervical cancer screening in low-resource settings.
机译:背景:在许多资源匮乏的地区,宫颈癌的细胞学筛查存在障碍。这项研究评估了人类乳头瘤病毒(HPV)DNA测试作为替代筛选方法。方法:使用Hybrid Capture I(HCI)检测了2944名先前未筛查的35-65岁南非妇女的宫颈样本的高危型HPV。妇女还进行了子宫颈抹片检查,子宫颈直接视觉检查和Cervicography(TM)。在任何筛查试验中呈阳性的妇女均需接受阴道镜检查。活检证实为低级别鳞状上皮内病变(SIL)(n = 95),高级别SILs(n = 74)或浸润性宫颈癌(n = 12)的妇女的样本,以及无使用更灵敏的Hybrid Capture II(HCII)测定法对宫颈疾病(n = 243)的HPV DNA进行了重新测试。所有P值都是双面的。结果:使用HCI技术检测出86例患有严重SIL或浸润性癌的女性中高风险的HPV DNA,在2680例女性和2243例女性中检测到12.2%的高危HPV DNA和243例女性中的18.1%和HCII分析。使用HCII分析进行HPV DNA检测比检测细胞学检测高级别SIL和浸润性癌症的敏感性更高(McNemar's test,P = .04),而使用HCI分析进行的检测具有同等的敏感性(P = .61)。细胞学的特异性(96.8%)比HCI分析(87.8%)或HCII分析(81.9%)具有统计学上显着更好的特异性(P <0.01)。接收器的工作特性曲线确定了测试截止值,该值使HPV DNA测试可以识别出57%的高级别SIL或癌症女性,而将不到5%的无宫颈疾病的女性分类为HPV DNA阳性。结论:HPV DNA检测的敏感性等于或优于细胞学。由于HPV DNA检测程序可能比细胞学筛查更容易实施,因此应在资源贫乏地区对HPV检测进行原发性宫颈癌筛查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号