首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials >Comparison of four methods to simulate swelling in poroelastic finite element models of intervertebral discs.
【24h】

Comparison of four methods to simulate swelling in poroelastic finite element models of intervertebral discs.

机译:四种模拟椎间盘多孔弹性有限元模型中膨胀的方法的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Osmotic phenomena influence the intervertebral disc biomechanics. Their simulation is challenging and can be undertaken at different levels of complexity. Four distinct approaches to simulate the osmotic behaviour of the intervertebral disc (a fixed boundary pore pressure model, a fixed osmotic pressure gradient model in the whole disc or only in the nucleus pulposus, and a swelling model with strain-dependent osmotic pressure) were analysed. Predictions were compared using a 3D poroelastic finite element model of a L4-L5 spinal unit under three different loading conditions: free swelling for 8 h and two daily loading cycles: (i) 200 N compression for 8 h followed by 500 N compression for 16 h; (ii) 500 N for 8 h followed by 1000 N for 16 h. Overall, all swelling models calculated comparable results, with differences decreasing under greater loads. Results predicted with the fixed boundary pore pressure and the fixed osmotic pressure in the whole disc models were nearly identical. The boundary pore pressure model, however, cannot simulate differential osmotic pressures in disc regions. The swelling model offered the best potential to provide more accurate results, conditional upon availability of reliable values for the required coefficients and material properties. Possible fields of application include mechanobiology investigations and crack opening and propagation. However, the other approaches are a good compromise between the ease of implementation and the reliability of results, especially when considering higher loads or when the focus is on global results such as spinal kinematics.
机译:渗透现象影响椎间盘的生物力学。他们的模拟具有挑战性,可以在不同的复杂度上进行。分析了四种不同的模拟椎间盘渗透行为的方法(固定边界孔隙压力模型,整个椎盘或仅在髓核中的固定渗透压梯度模型,以及与应变有关的渗透压的溶胀模型) 。使用L4-L5脊柱单元的3D多孔弹性有限元模型在三种不同的加载条件下比较预测:自由膨胀8 h和两个每日加载周期:(i)200 N压缩8 h,然后500 N压缩16 H; (ii)500 N持续8 h,然后1000 N持续16 h。总体而言,所有膨胀模型都计算出可比较的结果,但在较大载荷下差异会减小。在整个圆盘模型中,用固定的边界孔隙压力和固定的渗透压预测的结果几乎相同。然而,边界孔隙压力模型不能模拟圆盘区域的渗透压差。膨胀模型具有最大的潜力,可以提供更准确的结果,条件是所需系数和材料属性的可靠值的可用性。可能的应用领域包括力学生物学研究以及裂纹的扩展和扩展。但是,其他方法在实现的简便性和结果的可靠性之间取得了很好的折衷,尤其是在考虑更高的负荷或当重点放在诸如脊柱运动学之类的整体结果上时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号