首页> 外文期刊>Clinical neurophysiology >The effects of interstimulus interval on event-related indices of attention: An auditory selective attention test of perceptual load theory.
【24h】

The effects of interstimulus interval on event-related indices of attention: An auditory selective attention test of perceptual load theory.

机译:间质间隔对事件相关注意指数的影响:知觉负荷理论的听觉选择性注意测试。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: We examined the impact of perceptual load by manipulating interstimulus interval (ISI) in two auditory selective attention studies that varied in the difficulty of the target discrimination. METHODS: In the paradigm, channels were separated by frequency and target/deviant tones were softer in intensity. Three ISI conditions were presented: fast (300ms), medium (600ms) and slow (900ms). Behavioral (accuracy and RT) and electrophysiological measures (Nd, P3b) were observed. RESULTS: In both studies, participants evidenced poorer accuracy during the fast ISI condition than the slow suggesting that ISI impacted task difficulty. However, none of the three measures of processing examined, Nd amplitude, P3b amplitude elicited by unattended deviant stimuli, or false alarms to unattended deviants, were impacted by ISI in the manner predicted by perceptual load theory. CONCLUSIONS: The prediction based on perceptual load theory, that there would be more processing of irrelevant stimuli under conditions of low as compared to high perceptual load, was not supported in these auditory studies. SIGNIFICANCE: Task difficulty/perceptual load impacts the processing of irrelevant stimuli in the auditory modality differently than predicted by perceptual load theory, and perhaps differently than in the visual modality.
机译:目的:我们在两个听觉选择性注意研究中通过操纵刺激间隔(ISI)来检查知觉负荷的影响,这些研究在目标识别的难度上有所不同。方法:在范式中,通道按频率分隔,目标/偏离音调强度较弱。提出了三种ISI条件:快(300ms),中(600ms)和慢(900ms)。观察到行为(准确性和RT)和电生理指标(Nd,P3b)。结果:在两项研究中,参与者均表明,在快速ISI情况下的准确性较慢在ISI条件下差,这表明ISI影响任务难度。但是,ISI不会以知觉负载理论预测的方式影响所检查的三个处理度量,即Nd振幅,由无人值守的异常刺激引起的P3b振幅或对无人值守的偏差的错误警报。结论:基于听觉负荷理论的预测表明,与高知觉负荷相比,在低负荷条件下会有更多无关刺激的处理,这些听觉研究并不支持这种预测。意义:任务难度/知觉负荷对听觉方式中无关刺激的处理与知觉负荷理论所预测的方式不同,也许与视觉方式不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号