...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical neurophysiology >Prediction of 'awakening' and outcome in prolonged acute coma from severe traumatic brain injury: evidence for validity of short latency SEPs.
【24h】

Prediction of 'awakening' and outcome in prolonged acute coma from severe traumatic brain injury: evidence for validity of short latency SEPs.

机译:严重创伤性脑损伤导致的急性急性昏迷中“觉醒”和预后的预测:短潜伏期SEP有效性的证据。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic value of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) considering both 'awakening' and disability. METHODS: SEPs were recorded in 60 severe TBI with duration of acute coma>7 days. N20-P25 amplitudes, their side-to-side asymmetry and CCT were measured. SEPs on each hemisphere were classified as normal (N), pathological (P) or absent (A). 'Awakening' and disability were assessed after at least 12 months using Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). SEP predictive value was compared with GCS and EEG reactivity RESULTS: Seventy-five percent regained consciousness. 29/60 had a good outcome (GOS 4-5) and 31/60 had a bad outcome (GOS 1-3). According to the ROC curve, SEP findings were classified in 3 grades. Grade I (NN, NP) had PPV of 93.1% for 'awakening' and 86.2% for good outcome. Grade III (AA) had PPV of 100% for bad outcome and 72.7% for 'awakening'. Grade II (PP, NA, PA) was associated with the wider range of outcome. A multivariate analysis including SEP grading, GCS and EEG reactivity did not increase the percentage of cases prognosticated by SEP alone. CONCLUSIONS: We confirm the high predictive value of SEPs in TBI, which is greater than GCS and EEG reactivity. Indeed, SEP grades I and III were able to predict the correct prognosis in more than 80% of severe TBI. Therefore, SEPs should be used more widely in the prognosis of severe TBI. SIGNIFICANCE: Differently from post-anoxic, in post-traumatic coma the presence of normal SEPs has a favourable predictive value both for 'awakening' and disability. We think that in literature enough attention has still not been paid to this finding.
机译:目的:评估体感诱发电位(SEPs)在严重创伤性脑损伤(TBI)中的预后价值,同时考虑“唤醒”和残疾。方法:在60例重度TBI患者中记录SEP,持续时间≥7天。测量了N20-P25振幅,它们的左右不对称性和CCT。每个半球的SEP分为正常(N),病理(P)或不存在(A)。至少12个月后使用格拉斯哥成果量表(GOS)评估“觉醒”和残疾。将SEP预测值与GCS和EEG反应性进行了比较。结果:75%的患者恢复了意识。 29/60的结果很好(GOS 4-5),31/60的结果不好(GOS 1-3)。根据ROC曲线,SEP结果分为3个等级。一级(NN,NP)“唤醒”的PPV为93.1%,良好结果的PPV为86.2%。 III级(AA)的不良结果PPV为100%,“觉醒” PPV为72.7%。 II级(PP,NA,PA)与更广泛的预后相关。包括SEP分级,GCS和EEG反应性在内的多变量分析并没有增加仅由SEP预后的病例百分比。结论:我们证实SBIs在TBI中具有较高的预测价值,高于GCS和EEG反应性。确实,I级和III级SEP能够预测80%以上的严重TBI患者的正确预后。因此,SEPs应在重度TBI的预后中更广泛地使用。意义:与缺氧后不同,在创伤后昏迷中,正常SEP的存在对于“苏醒”和残疾均具有良好的预测价值。我们认为,在文学上仍未对这一发现给予足够的重视。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号