首页> 外文期刊>Journal of telemedicine and telecare >A randomized controlled clinical trial of pacemaker follow-up in clinic and by telemedical interpretation of the pacemakers' magnet mode
【24h】

A randomized controlled clinical trial of pacemaker follow-up in clinic and by telemedical interpretation of the pacemakers' magnet mode

机译:心脏起搏器随访的随机对照临床试验在临床中,并通过远程医学解释起搏器的磁模式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We assessed a two-stage follow-up procedure for cardiac pacemakers, where in-clinic follow-ups were partly replaced by telemedical follow-ups. This was compared with the standard follow-up regime (in-clinic follow-up only). The new procedure required an electronic patient record, a telemedicai follow-up unit for recording ECGs while the pacemaker was temporarily set to magnet mode, an ECG processing unit, and a reviewing and reporting unit. A total of 177 (86 female) patients were randomized to the control group and 182 (98 female) patients to the telemedicine group, in the telemedicine group, 234 telemedical follow-ups were performed. Out of these, 68 required an additional in-clinic follow-up, while 166 were sufficient for assessing the pacemakers' working status. During the study, there were 19 deaths in the telemedicine group and 20 in the control group. There was no significant difference between the two groups(P = 0.40). The probability that an individual patient's pacemaker would not to be replaced over time was analysed in a similar way to the Kaplan-Meier survival function. Fewer pacemakers were replaced in the telemedicine group (14) than in the control group (18), but the difference was not significant (P = 0.26). We conclude that alternating telemedical and in-clinic follow-ups brings no additional risks for patients. The follow-up procedure is feasible and interpretation of the pacemakers' magnet effect provides an easy-to-use, manufacturer-independent method of assessing the pacemakers' working status. This should reduce the patient load on pacemaker centres and decrease the overall costs of pacemaker therapy.
机译:我们评估了心脏起搏器的两个阶段的随访程序,其中,临床后的随访部分被远程医疗随访所代替。将此与标准的随访方案(仅临床随访)进行了比较。新程序需要一个电子病历,一个用于记录ECG的远程医疗跟进单元,将起搏器暂时设置为磁铁模式,一个ECG处理单元以及一个检查和报告单元。总共177名(86名女性)患者被随机分为对照组,而182名(98名女性)患者被分为远程医疗组,在远程医疗组中,进行了234次远程医疗随访。其中68例需要进行进一步的临床随访,而166例足以评估起搏器的工作状态。在研究期间,远程医疗组有19例死亡,对照组有20例死亡。两组之间无显着差异(P = 0.40)。以与Kaplan-Meier生存函数相似的方式分析了个别患者的起搏器将不随时间更换的可能性。远程医疗组(14)更换的起搏器少于对照组(18),但差异不显着(P = 0.26)。我们得出的结论是,交替进行远程医疗和临床随访不会给患者带来额外的风险。后续程序是可行的,对起搏器的磁效应的解释提供了一种易于使用,与制造商无关的评估起搏器工作状态的方法。这将减少患者在起搏器中心的负担,并降低起搏器治疗的总成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号