...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of telemedicine and telecare >A retrospective quality assessment of the 7119 call triage system in Tokyo - telephone triage for non-ambulance cases
【24h】

A retrospective quality assessment of the 7119 call triage system in Tokyo - telephone triage for non-ambulance cases

机译:东京7119呼叫分类系统的回顾性质量评估-非救护车案例的电话分类

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We assessed the accuracy of telephone triage at the 7119 telephone consultation centre in Tokyo. We evaluated walk-in patients at primary care facilities in a clinic or hospital. Nurses asked all patients calling 7119 to join the study and gave them a specific identification number (ID no) at the end of the telephone consultation. The outcome of the consultation was defined as discharge to home (home), admittance to hospital (hospitalization), referral, or transfer to another hospital. After matching consultation records and patient data by ID no, emergency medical physicians reviewed the protocol for problems. During the study, consultation nurses issued an ID no in 17,141 cases, and hospitals and clinics sent back the data on 1205 patients. Among these patients, 1119 cases (93%) were home, 59 cases (5%) were hospitalization, 18 cases (2%) were referral and 9 cases (1%) were transfer. Of the 86 cases which had an outcome of hospitalization, referral or transfer, there were 56 cases with matched patient data. Among these 56 cases, review showed no significant problems with 37 cases. However, there were 11 cases with patient refusal to comply with the triage recommendation, 4 cases with 7119 staff education problems and 4 cases with problems with the protocol itself. We were able to evaluate the 7119 telephone triage system in Tokyo. The study identified three types of problems with the triage process: refusal of telephone triage recommendations, problems with staff education and problems with the protocol itself.
机译:我们在东京的7119电话咨询中心评估了电话分类的准确性。我们评估了门诊或医院初级保健机构的门诊病人。护士要求所有致电7119的患者加入研究,并在电话咨询结束时给他们提供一个特定的识别号(ID号)。咨询的结果被定义为出院(入院),入院(住院),转诊或转移到另一家医院。在通过ID号匹配咨询记录和患者数据后,急诊医生检查了协议中的问题。在研究过程中,咨询护士发放了17141例患者的身份证号,医院和诊所将1205例患者的数据发回。在这些患者中,有1119例(93%)在家庭中,有59例(5%)在住院中,有18例(2%)在转诊中,有9例(1%)在转诊中。在有住院,转诊或转院结局的86例病例中,有56例具有匹配的患者数据。在这56例病例中,复查显示37例无明显问题。但是,有11例患者拒绝遵守分类建议,4例存在7119名员工教育问题,4例存在协议本身问题。我们能够评估东京的7119电话分类系统。该研究确定了分诊过程中的三种类型的问题:拒绝电话分诊建议,工作人员的教育问题以及协议本身的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号