...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical neurophysiology >Motor thresholds in humans: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study comparing different pulse waveforms, current directions and stimulator types.
【24h】

Motor thresholds in humans: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study comparing different pulse waveforms, current directions and stimulator types.

机译:人类的运动阈值:一项经颅磁刺激研究,比较了不同的脉冲波形,电流方向和刺激器类型。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the stimulation effectiveness of different magnetic stimulator devices with respect to pulse waveform and current direction in the motor cortex. METHODS: In 8 normal subjects we determined motor thresholds of transcranial magnetic stimulation in a small hand muscle. We used focal figure-of-eight coils of 3 common stimulators (Dantec Magpro, Magstim 200 and Magstim Rapid) and systematically varied current direction (postero-anterior versus antero-posterior, perpendicular to the central sulcus) as well as pulse waveform (monophasic versus biphasic). The coil position was kept constant with a stereotactic positioning device. RESULTS: Motor thresholds varied consistently with changing stimulus parameters, despite substantial interindividual variability. By normalizing the values with respect to the square root of the energy of the capacitors in the different stimulators, we found a homogeneous pattern of threshold variations. The normalized Magstim threshold values were consistently higher than the normalized Dantec thresholds by a factor of 1.3. For both stimulator types the monophasic pulse was more effective if the current passed the motor cortex in a postero-anterior direction rather than antero-posterior. In contrast, the biphasic pulse was weaker with the first upstroke in the postero-anterior direction. We calculated mean factors for transforming the intensity values of a particular configuration into that of another configuration by normalizing the different threshold values of each individual subject to his lowest threshold value. CONCLUSIONS: Our transformation factors allow us to compare stimulation intensities from studies using different devices and pulse forms. The effectiveness of stimulation as a function of waveform and current direction follows the same pattern as in a peripheral nerve preparation (J Physiol (Lond) 513 (1998) 571).
机译:目的:针对运动皮层中的脉冲波形和电流方向,评估不同磁性刺激器设备的刺激效果。方法:在8名正常受试者中,我们确定了小手部肌肉经颅磁刺激的运动阈值。我们使用了3种常见刺激器(Dantec Magpro,Magstim 200和Magstim Rapid)的八位聚焦线圈,并系统地改变了电流方向(与中央沟垂直的前后方向和前后方向)以及脉搏波形(单相与双相)。利用立体定位装置将线圈位置保持恒定。结果:尽管个体间存在很大差异,但运动阈值随刺激参数的变化而一致。通过标准化相对于不同刺激器中电容器能量平方根的值,我们发现了阈值变化的均匀模式。归一化的Magstim阈值始终比归一化的Dantec阈值高1.3倍。对于这两种刺激器类型,如果电流以后-前方向而不是后-后方向通过运动皮质,则单相脉冲会更有效。相比之下,双相脉冲在后前方向的第一次上冲中较弱。通过将每个个体的不同阈值归一化为最低阈值,我们计算了将特定配置的强度值转换为另一配置的强度值的平均因子。结论:我们的转化因子使我们能够比较使用不同装置和脉冲形式进行的研究的刺激强度。作为波形和电流方向的函数的刺激的有效性遵循与周围神经准备相同的模式(J Physiol(Lond)513(1998)571)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号