首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society: JINS >Good Holders, Bad Shufflers: An Examination of Working Memory Processes and Modalities in Children with and without Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
【24h】

Good Holders, Bad Shufflers: An Examination of Working Memory Processes and Modalities in Children with and without Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

机译:好的持有人,不好的洗牌者:对有和没有注意力缺陷/多动障碍的儿童的工作记忆过程和方式的检查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to examine working memory (WM) modalities (visual-spatial and auditory-verbal) and processes (maintenance and manipulation) in children with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The sample consisted of 63 8-year-old children with ADHD and an age- and sex-matched non-ADHD comparison group (N=51). Auditory-verbal and visual-spatial WM were assessed using the Digit Span and Spatial Span subtests from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children Integrated - Fourth Edition. WM maintenance and manipulation were assessed via forward and backward span indices, respectively. Data were analyzed using a 3-way Group (ADHD vs. non-ADHD)xModality (Auditory-Verbal vs. Visual-Spatial)xCondition (Forward vs. Backward) Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Secondary analyses examined differences between Combined and Predominantly Inattentive ADHD presentations. Significant GroupxCondition (p=.02) and GroupxModality (p=.03) interactions indicated differentially poorer performance by those with ADHD on backward relative to forward and visual-spatial relative to auditory-verbal tasks, respectively. The 3-way interaction was not significant. Analyses targeting ADHD presentations yielded a significant GroupxCondition interaction (p=.009) such that children with ADHD-Predominantly Inattentive Presentation performed differentially poorer on backward relative to forward tasks compared to the children with ADHD-Combined Presentation. Findings indicate a specific pattern of WM weaknesses (i.e., WM manipulation and visual-spatial tasks) for children with ADHD. Furthermore, differential patterns of WM performance were found for children with ADHD-Predominantly Inattentive versus Combined Presentations. (JINS, 2016, 22, 1-11)
机译:这项研究的目的是检查患有和没有注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的儿童的工作记忆(WM)方式(视觉空间和听觉语言)和过程(维持和操纵)。样本包括63名8岁多动症儿童以及年龄和性别相匹配的非多动症比较组(N = 51)。听觉语言和视觉空间WM的评估采用了Wechsler儿童智能量表(第四版)中的“数字跨度”和“空间跨度”子测验。 WM维护和操纵分别通过前向和后向跨度指数进行评估。使用三方组(ADHD与非ADHD)x模态(听觉-言语与视觉空间)x条件(前向与后向)方差分析(ANOVA)来分析数据。次要分析检查了合并和主要注意力不集中的多动症表现之间的差异。显着的GroupxCondition(p = .02)和GroupxModality(p = .03)交互作用分别表明,ADHD相对于向前和相对于听觉-语言任务在向后视觉空间方面的表现较差。三向相互作用不显着。针对ADHD演示文稿的分析产生了显着的GroupxCondition交互作用(p = .009),因此与具有ADHD组合演示文稿的孩子相比,具有ADHD-主要注意力不集中演示文稿的孩子在向后任务上的表现差于向前。研究结果表明患有ADHD的儿童的WM弱点的特定模式(即WM操作和视觉空间任务)。此外,发现多动症-主要是注意力不集中的儿童与综合表现儿童的WM表现差异。 (JINS,2016,22,1-11)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号