...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical neuropharmacology >A randomized open comparison of long-acting injectable risperidone and treatment as usual for prevention of relapse, rehospitalization, and urgent care referral in community-treated patients with rapid cycling bipolar disorder.
【24h】

A randomized open comparison of long-acting injectable risperidone and treatment as usual for prevention of relapse, rehospitalization, and urgent care referral in community-treated patients with rapid cycling bipolar disorder.

机译:长效可注射利培酮和常规治疗在预防社区复发的快速循环双相情感障碍患者中的​​复发,再次住院和急诊转诊的常规治疗之间的随机开放比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare adjunctive long-acting injectable risperidone plus treatment as usual (RLAI+TAU) versus TAU alone for relapse, rehospitalization, and urgent care events in patients with bipolar disorder in routine care settings. METHODS: This was a 12-month randomized open comparison of RLAI+TAU (n = 20) and TAU alone (n = 25) in adults with rapid cycling, Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview-confirmed bipolar I/II disorder and 4 or more illness relapses in the preceding 12 months. Clinical outcome was assessed every 2 weeks using the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation instrument. Psychopathology and quality of life were assessed monthly using the Young Mania Rating Scale, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms-Self Report 16 and Quality of Life, Enjoyment, and Satisfaction Questionnaire. Relapse was defined using symptom severity, necessary clinical adjustment of medications, and urgent care referrals. Relapse rates and duration were calculated per person per year of follow-up. All treatments were provided by community-based clinicians. RESULTS: There were no significant between-groups differences in the total number or duration of relapse events (any cause) or in the number of manic or depressive relapses. Thirteen of 14 urgent care events (hospitalization, emergency department visit, intensive outpatient, or respite care referral) occurred with TAU alone (92.3%). Urgent care referral (P < 0.04) and necessary medication change rates (P = 0.01) were significantly lower in the RLAI+TAU group. There were no significant between-groups differences in the duration of follow-up, hospitalization rates, or psychopathology over time. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of any-cause relapse may not differ significantly between RLAI+TAU and TAU alone; however, RLAI may reduce the need for urgent care referrals or the frequency of medication adjustments to prevent relapse in community-treated patients with rapid cycling bipolar disorder. Additional investigation is warranted.
机译:目的:比较常规护理环境中双相情感障碍患者的复发性,重新住院和紧急护理事件,以比较常规长效注射利培酮加常规治疗(RLAI + TAU)与单独使用TAU的比较。方法:这是在快速骑行,接受Mini International Neuropsychiatric确认的双相I / II障碍且有4种或以上疾病的成年人中,RLAI + TAU(n = 20)和单独TAU(n = 25)的12个月随机开放比较在之前的12个月内复发。使用纵向间隔随访评估工具每2周评估一次临床结局。使用年轻躁狂症评分量表,蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表,抑郁症状快速清单-自我报告16以及生活质量,娱乐和满意度问卷,每月评估心理病理学和生活质量。复发是根据症状严重程度,必要的药物临床调整以及急诊转诊定义的。计算复发率和持续时间,每人每年随访一次。所有治疗均由社区临床医生提供。结果:复发事件的总数或持续时间(任何原因)或躁狂或抑郁发作的次数在组间无显着差异。 14例紧急护理事件中的13例(住院,急诊就诊,重症门诊或暂托医疗转诊)仅发生TAU(92.3%)。 RLAI + TAU组的急诊转诊(P <0.04)和必要的药物变更率(P = 0.01)显着降低。随访时间,住院率或精神病理学随时间的变化在各组之间无显着差异。结论:RLAI + TAU和单独使用TAU之间,任何原因的复发率可能均无显着差异。但是,RLAI可以减少急诊转诊的需要或减少药物调整的频率,以防止社区治疗的患有快速循环性双相情感障碍的患者复发。有必要进行进一步调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号