首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology: JEADV >Use of topical herbal remedies and cosmetics: a questionnaire-based investigation in dermatology out-patients.
【24h】

Use of topical herbal remedies and cosmetics: a questionnaire-based investigation in dermatology out-patients.

机译:局部草药和化妆品的使用:皮肤科门诊患者的问卷调查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: Although topical remedies and cosmetics based on herbal ingredients are becoming increasingly popular with the public due to the perception that botanical compounds are safer and healthier than their synthetic counterparts, a large number of adverse cutaneous effects of plant extracts, notably contact sensitization, have been reported in medical literature. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of herbal compound usage in a dermatological out-patient population and to estimate the incidence of consequent cutaneous side-effects. METHODS: Four hundred patients were subjected to a self-administered 15-item questionnaire to assess both prevalence and type of topical botanical preparations used and occurrence of skin adverse reactions. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-one patients (60.25%) reported use of natural topical products, predominantly aloe, marigold, chamomile, propolis and arnica. Females used herbal products, for both medicinal and cosmetic purposes, more frequently than males. Fifteen patients (6.22%) referred one or more adverse cutaneous reactions. CONCLUSION: Herbal preparations were widely used in the examined population, but, despite the common belief in the innocuous nature of botanical extracts, the incidence of side-effects referred by the patients confirms that they should be regarded as a potential source of adverse skin events. The lack of adequate patch testing in case of suspected contact allergic dermatitis, incomplete or misleading product labelling, and the risk of chemical adulteration may represent further concerns as regards application of botanical products.
机译:背景:尽管由于人们认为植物性化合物比合成植物性化合物更安全和健康,基于草药成分的局部药物和化妆品在公众中越来越流行,但植物提取物的大量不利皮肤效应(尤其是接触致敏性)具有在医学文献中已有报道。目的:评估皮肤病门诊人群中使用草药的普遍性,并评估由此产生的皮肤副作用的发生率。方法:对400名患者进行了一项自我管理的15个项目的问卷调查,以评估所用局部植物制剂的患病率和类型以及皮肤不良反应的发生率。结果:241位患者(60.25%)报告使用天然外用产品,主要是芦荟,万寿菊,洋甘菊,蜂胶和山金车。女性比男性更频繁地将草药产品用于医药和美容目的。 15名患者(6.22%)转介了一种或多种不良皮肤反应。结论:草药制剂被广泛用于接受检查的人群,但是,尽管人们普遍认为植物提取物具有无毒性质,但患者提及的副作用发生率证实,应将其视为不良皮肤事件的潜在来源。 。在怀疑接触性过敏性皮炎,产品标签不完整或误导性的情况下,缺乏足够的贴剂测试以及化学掺假的风险,可能代表着对植物产品应用的进一步关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号