首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the history of the behavioral sciences >WHISTLES, BELLS, AND COGS IN MACHINES: THOMAS HUXLEY AND EPIPHENOMENALISM
【24h】

WHISTLES, BELLS, AND COGS IN MACHINES: THOMAS HUXLEY AND EPIPHENOMENALISM

机译:机器中的哨子,钟声和齿轮:托马斯·赫X黎和表象症

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this paper I try to shed some historical light upon the doctrine of epiphenomenalism, by focusing on the version of epiphenomenalism championed by Thomas Huxley, which is often treated as a classic statement of the doctrine. I argue that it is doubtful if Huxley held any form of metaphysical epiphenomenalism, and that he held a more limited form of empirical epiphenomenalism with respect to consciousness but not with respect to mentality per se. Contrary to what is conventionally supposed, Huxley's empirical epiphenomenalism with respect to consciousness was not simply based upon the demonstration of the neurophysiological basis of conscious mentality, or derived from the extension of mechanistic and reflexive principles of explanation to encompass all forms of animal and human behavior, but was based upon the demonstration of purposive and coordinated animal and human behavior in the absence of consciousness. Given Huxley's own treatment of mentality, his characterization of animals and humans as "conscious automata" was not well chosen.
机译:在本文中,我将着眼于托马斯·赫x黎(Thomas Huxley)倡导的表观现象主义的版本,以期对表观现象主义的学说提供一些历史性的启示,而这种现象通常被视为该学说的经典陈述。我认为,赫x黎是否持有任何形式的形而上学表观主义,并且就意识而非心理本身而言,他所持有的实证表象主义形式更为有限。与传统上的假设相反,赫x黎关于意识的经验表现象不是简单地基于意识心理的神经生理学基础的证明,也不是从解释的机械性和反身性原理的扩展中获得的,以涵盖所有形式的动物和人类行为,但是基于在没有意识的情况下有目的和协调的动物和人类行为的证明。考虑到赫x黎自己对心理的处理方式,他对动物和人类的“有意识的自动机”特征并不是很好的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号