...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical neurology and neurosurgery >Laparotomy vs minimally invasive laparoscopic ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement for hydrocephalus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Laparotomy vs minimally invasive laparoscopic ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement for hydrocephalus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:开腹术与微创腹腔镜脑室-腹膜分流术治疗脑积水:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) surgery is the most commonly used method for the treatment of hydrocephalus. Traditionally, distal catheters in the VPS surgery have been placed either through a standard small open laparotomy or via a laparoscopic technique. Although there are many studies demonstrating the benefits of a minimally invasive approach, limited research has directly compared the two techniques used in VPS surgery. The present meta-analysis aims to provide the first comprehensive review of all published observational studies and randomized controlled trials reporting outcomes of laparotomy and laparoscopy in VPS. Electronic searches were performed using six databases from their inception to February 2015. Relevant studies comparing conventional laparotomy and a laparoscopic video-guided approach in VPS were included. Data were extracted and analyzed according to predefined clinical endpoints. A total often studies were identified for inclusion in the present analysis. Results indicated that the laparoscopic technique was associated with a slight but significant reduction in operating time (similar to 10 min), a significantly lower rate of abdominal malposition, distal obstruction and distal shunt failure. There was no difference between the laparotomic and laparoscopic approaches in the length of hospital stay, complication rate, proximal shunt failure or infection rate. The present systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that the laparoscopic technique in VPS surgery is associated with reduced shunt failure and abdominal malposition compared to the open laparotomy technique, with no significant difference in rates of infection or other complications. The lack of studies with high levels of evidence may contribute to bias in our conclusions and the long-term relative merits require validation by further prospective, randomized studies. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:脑室腹膜分流术(VPS)是治疗脑积水最常用的方法。传统上,VPS手术中的远侧导管已通过标准的小型开放式剖腹术或通过腹腔镜技术放置。尽管有许多研究表明微创方法的益处,但有限的研究直接比较了VPS手术中使用的两种技术。本荟萃分析旨在对所有已发表的观察性研究和报告VPS剖腹手术和腹腔镜检查结果的随机对照试验进行首次全面综述。从开始到2015年2月,使用六个数据库进行了电子搜索。其中包括比较常规剖腹手术和腹腔镜视频引导VPS方法的相关研究。根据预定义的临床终点提取和分析数据。总的经常性研究被确定为包括在本分析中。结果表明,腹腔镜技术与手术时间略有减少(约10分钟),腹部错位,远端梗阻和远端分流失败的发生率显着降低有关。腹腔镜和腹腔镜方法在住院时间,并发症发生率,近端分流失败或感染率方面无差异。目前的系统评价和荟萃分析表明,与开放式剖腹术相比,VPS手术中的腹腔镜技术可减少分流失败和腹部错位,感染率或其他并发症无显着差异。缺乏高水平证据的研究可能会导致我们的结论存在偏差,长期的相对优势需要进一步的前瞻性,随机研究进行验证。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号