...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association. >The effectiveness of the Mosquito Magnet trap for reducing biting midge (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) populations in coastal residential backyards.
【24h】

The effectiveness of the Mosquito Magnet trap for reducing biting midge (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) populations in coastal residential backyards.

机译:蚊虫诱捕器可有效减少沿海住宅后院的叮咬蚊(Diptera:Ceratopogonidae)种群。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study evaluated the effectiveness of single Mosquito Magnet' traps to consistently reduce biting midge populations in a coastal northwest Florida residential neighborhood. Midge abundance from 5 backyards, each with a Mosquito Magnet trap, was compared with 3 backyards without traps (controls). Midge populations were sampled once weekly for 24 h in each backyard by using a Centers for Disease Control (CDC) suction trap baited with carbon dioxide. In addition, midge accumulations from Mosquito Magnet traps were collected once a week at the time of CDC trap operation while biting midge populations were manually sampled from each backyard by using a "sand fly bat" (i.e., a wire-handle flyswatter fitted with a 10.5-cm2 plastic 14 X 14 mesh screen). Eighteen midge species were collected during the study but the majority (99.9%) collected from all backyards were (in descending order): Culicoides mississippiensis, C. furens, and C. melleus. Midge populations from CDC traps in yards with Mosquito Magnets were significantly lower on 2 of 45 wk (March 28 and April 3) when compared with control backyards. Weekly reduction attributed to Mosquito Magnets was not consistent and ranged from 4.2 to 85.3%. No significant difference was found in mean midge abundance on sand fly bats from yards with Mosquito Magnets compared with control yards. On the average, cooperators with Mosquito Magnet traps reported that their seasonal level of midge reduction (as related to a monthly ranked degree of annoyance) was variable and often not consistently below their threshold.
机译:这项研究评估了单个蚊帐诱捕器在佛罗里达西北部沿海居民区持续减少咬人的蚊子种群的有效性。将来自5个后院(每个都有蚊子陷阱)的蚊子丰富度与没有陷阱的3个后院(对照)进行比较。在每个后院,每周一次对人群进行一次采样,采样时间为24小时,方法是使用疾病诱捕中心(CDC)捕获的二氧化碳诱集器。此外,在CDC捕集阱运行时,每周收集一次来自蚊帐捕集器的蚊虫accumulation积物,同时使用“沙蝇蝙蝠”(即配备有10.5平方厘米的塑料14 X 14目筛网)。在研究期间收集了18种蚊种,但从所有后院收集的大多数(99.9%)为(降序排列):Culicoides mississippiensis,C。furens和C. melleus。与对照后院相比,蚊子围场中CDC诱捕器中的蚊虫种群在45周中的2周(3月28日和4月3日)显着降低。归因于蚊帐的每周减少量不一致,范围为4.2%至85.3%。与对照围场相比,用蚊帐围场的沙蝇蝙蝠的平均蚊虫数量没有显着差异。平均而言,使用灭蚊器的合作者报告说,他们的蚊虫减少的季节性水平(与每月排名的烦恼程度有关)是可变的,通常不会始终低于其阈值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号