首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association. >COMPARATIVE FIELD EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT TRAPS FOR COLLECTING ADULT PHLEBOTOMINE SAND FLIES (DIPTERA: PSYCHODIDAE) IN AN ENDEMIC AREA OF CUTANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS IN QUINTANA ROO, MEXICO
【24h】

COMPARATIVE FIELD EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT TRAPS FOR COLLECTING ADULT PHLEBOTOMINE SAND FLIES (DIPTERA: PSYCHODIDAE) IN AN ENDEMIC AREA OF CUTANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS IN QUINTANA ROO, MEXICO

机译:在墨西哥昆塔纳罗奥州流行的利什曼病流行地区收集不同的捕蝇器的野外捕蝇器比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Phlebotominae are the vectors of Leishmania parasites. It is important to have available surveillance and collection methods for the sand fly vectors. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate and compare traps for the collection of sand fly species and to analyze trap catches along months and transects. Field evaluations over a year were conducted in an endemic area of leishmaniasis in the state of Quintana Roo, Mexico. A randomized-block design was implemented in study area with tropical rainforest vegetation. The study design utilized 4 transects with 11 trap types: 1) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) light trap with incandescent bulb (CDC-I), 2) CDC light trap with blue light-emitting diodes (LEDs) (CDC-B), 3) CDC light trap with white LEDs (CDC-W), 4) CDC light trap with red LEDs (CDC-R), 5) CDC light trap with green LEDs (CDC-G), 6) Disney trap, 7) Disney trap with white LEDs, 8) sticky panels, 9) sticky panels with white LEDs, 10) delta-like trap, and 11) delta-like trap with white LEDs. A total of 1,014 specimens of 13 species and 2 genera (Lutzomyia and Brumptomyia) were collected. There were significant differences in the mean number of sand flies caught with the 11 traps; CDC-I was (P = 0.0000) more effective than the other traps. Other traps exhibited the following results: CDC-W (17.46%), CDC-B (15.68%), CDC-G (14.89%), and CDC-R (14.30%). The relative abundance of different species varied according to trap types used, and the CDC-I trap attracted more specimens of the known vectors of Leishmania spp., such as like Lutzomyia cruciata, Lu. shannoni, and Lu. ovallesi. Disney trap captured more specimens of Lu. olmeca olmeca. Based on abundance and number of species, CDC light traps and Disney traps appeared to be good candidates for use in vector surveillance programs in this endemic area of Mexico.
机译:假单胞菌是利什曼原虫寄生虫的载体。对于沙蝇媒介,有可用的监视和收集方法很重要。本研究的目的是评估和比较收集沙蝇种的诱集装置,并分析沿月和样带捕获的诱集装置。在墨西哥金塔纳罗奥州的利什曼病流行地区进行了一年多的现场评估。研究区域采用热带雨林植被进行了随机区组设计。该研究设计利用了11种陷阱类型的4个样线:1)带有白炽灯泡(CDC-1)的疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)陷阱,2)带有蓝色发光二极管(LED)的CDC陷阱(CDC- B),3)带有白色LED的CDC陷阱(CDC-W),4)带有红色LED的CDC陷阱(CDC-R),5)带有绿色LED的CDC陷阱(CDC-G),6)迪士尼陷阱, 7)带有白色LED的迪士尼陷阱,8)粘性面板,9)带有白色LED的粘性面板,10)呈三角形的陷阱和11)带有白色LED的三角形的陷阱。总共收集了13种和2属(Lutzomyia和Brumptomyia)的1,014个标本。 11个诱捕器捕获的沙蝇的平均数量存在显着差异。 CDC-1比其他疏水阀更有效(P = 0.0000)。其他陷阱显示以下结果:CDC-W(17.46%),CDC-B(15.68%),CDC-G(14.89%)和CDC-R(14.30%)。不同物种的相对丰度根据所使用的诱捕器类型而变化,并且CDC-1诱捕器吸引了更多的利什曼原虫属已知载体的标本,例如十字形Lutzomyia cruciata。香侬和卢。卵形迪斯尼陷阱捕获了更多卢的标本。奥尔梅卡奥尔梅卡。根据物种的数量和数量,CDC诱捕器和迪斯尼诱捕器似乎是在墨西哥这一流行地区进行媒介监测计划的良好候选者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号