首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association >Should programs of all-inclusive care for the elderly use community-based primary care physicians?
【24h】

Should programs of all-inclusive care for the elderly use community-based primary care physicians?

机译:老年人全包护理计划是否应使用社区基层医疗医生?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The program of All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) is a community-based, long-term care model designed for older adults that are nursing home eligible. Bound by original design and regulations, these programs have primarily utilized a center-based ("staff") primary care physician model. However, some believe that this might hinder expansion of the PACE model. In response to this concern, three PACE programs have explored the use of "community-based" primary care physicians (CBPCPs). In an attempt to evaluate the impact of this variation in the model, we surveyed the medical director, 2 community-based primary care physicians and 6 non-physician staff members at one of these sites. Responders generally support the use of CBPCPs as a useful and productive alternative way to expand PACE services to a wider audience of eligible patients. Because some staff members perceive that CBPCPs utilize hospital and NH services at a higher rate, continued education of both CBPCPs and staff members regarding the expectations from this relationship is needed.
机译:老年人全包护理计划(PACE)是基于社区的长期护理模型,专门为符合养老院条件的老年人设计。受原始设计和法规的约束,这些程序主要利用了基于中心的(“员工”)初级保健医师模型。但是,有些人认为这可能会阻止PACE模型的扩展。针对这种担忧,三个PACE计划探索了“基于社区的”初级保健医生(CBPCP)的使用。为了评估这种变化对模型的影响,我们在其中一个地点调查了医疗主管,2位社区初级保健医生和6位非医师工作人员。响应者通常支持使用CBPCP作为将PACE服务扩展到更多合格患者的有用且富有成效的替代方式。由于一些工作人员认为CBPCPs较高地利用了医院和NH服务,因此需要继续对CBPCPs和工作人员进行关于这种关系的期望的教育。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号