...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association >Animal-assisted therapy and loneliness in nursing homes: use of robotic versus living dogs.
【24h】

Animal-assisted therapy and loneliness in nursing homes: use of robotic versus living dogs.

机译:动物护理疗法和疗养院的孤独感:使用机器狗还是活着的狗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Loneliness is a common problem in long-term care facilities (LTCF) and previous work has shown that animal-assisted therapy (AAT) can to some degree reverse loneliness. Here, we compared the ability of a living dog (Dog) and a robotic dog (AIBO) to treat loneliness in elderly patients living in LTCF. In comparison with a control group not receiving AAT, both the Dog and AIBO groups had statistically significant improvements in their levels of loneliness. As measured by a modified Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale (MLAPS), residents showed high levels of attachment to both the dog and AIBO. Subscale analysis showed that the AIBO group scored lower than the living dog on "animal rights/animal welfare" but not on "general attachment" or "people substituting." However, MLAPS measures did not correlate with changes in loneliness, showing that attachment was not the mechanism by which AAT decreases loneliness. We conclude that interactive robotic dogs can reduce loneliness in residents of LTCF and that residents become attached to these robots. However, level of attachment does not explain the decrease in loneliness associated with AAT conducted with either a living or robotic dog.
机译:在长期护理机构(LTCF)中,孤独是一个普遍的问题,以前的工作表明,动物辅助疗法(AAT)可以在一定程度上逆转孤独感。在这里,我们比较了活体狗(Dog)和机器狗(AIBO)治疗LTCF中老年患者孤独感的能力。与未接受AAT的对照组相比,Dog和AIBO组的孤独感水平都有统计学上的显着改善。根据改良的列克星敦宠物依恋量表(MLAPS)进行的测量,居民对狗和AIBO的依恋程度都很高。分量表分析显示,AIBO组在“动物权利/动物福利”方面的得分低于活狗,但在“一般依恋”或“替代人”方面的得分却低于活狗。但是,MLAPS测度与孤独感的变化不相关,表明依恋不是AAT降低孤独感的机制。我们的结论是,互动式机器狗可以减少LTCF居民的孤独感,并且居民可以依附于这些机器人。但是,依恋水平并不能解释与活着或机器狗进行的AAT相关的孤独感的降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号