首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society >Implementing group medical visits for older adults at group health cooperative.
【24h】

Implementing group medical visits for older adults at group health cooperative.

机译:在团体健康合作社对老年人进行团体医疗探望。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In a pair of randomized controlled trials in the Kaiser Permanente delivery system in Colorado in the 1990s, group visits for older adults (monthly non-disease-specific group medical appointments for a cohort of patients led by primary care teams) were proven to reduce costs, decrease hospitalizations, and improve patient and provider satisfaction. As part of a translational effort, this group visit intervention was replicated in a delivery system in Seattle, Washington, and the log of total healthcare costs was measured in the first year of the intervention. Utilization and patient and physician satisfaction were secondary outcomes. For the cost and utilization analysis, a retrospective case-control design compared 221 case patients aged 65 and older with high outpatient usage in the previous 18 months with 1,015 control patients selected randomly from clinics not participating in the intervention. Controls were matched to cases on the number of primary care visits in the prior 18 months. Total costs were not statistically different for intervention patients and controls (Dollars 8,845 vs Dollars 10,288, P=.11), nor were there statistically significant differences in utilization, including hospital admissions and outpatient visits, but patient and provider satisfaction with the intervention was high. This translational effort did not demonstrate the cost savings of the original efficacy trials. Possible explanations for these divergent results may have to do with differences between those who participated and differences between the two delivery systems.
机译:在1990年代在科罗拉多州的Kaiser Permanente分娩系统中进行的一项随机对照试验中,事实证明,老年人的团体探视(每月由初级保健团队领导的一组患者的非疾病特定团体医疗预约)可降低成本,减少住院,并提高患者和服务提供者的满意度。作为一项翻译工作的一部分,该小组访问干预措施在华盛顿州西雅图市的分娩系统中进行了复制,并在干预措施的第一年对卫生保健总费用进行了记录。使用率以及患者和医师的满意度是次要结果。为了进行成本和利用率分析,采用回顾性病例对照设计,将过去18个月中门诊使用率较高的221名65岁及以上的病例患者与从不参与干预措施的诊所中随机选择的1,015例对照患者进行了比较。将对照与在前18个月中的初级保健就诊次数相匹配。干预患者和对照组的总费用无统计学差异(8,845美元对10,288美元,P = .11),使用率(包括住院人数和门诊患者)也无统计学差异,但患者和医疗服务提供者对干预的满意度很高。这项转换工作并未证明原始功效试验可节省成本。对于这些不同结果的可能解释可能与参与人员之间的差异以及两个交付系统之间的差异有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号