首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society >Once-daily cefepime versus ceftriaxone for nursing home-acquired pneumonia.
【24h】

Once-daily cefepime versus ceftriaxone for nursing home-acquired pneumonia.

机译:每天一次头孢吡肟与头孢曲松治疗家庭获得性肺炎。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To compare once-daily intramuscular cefepime with ceftriaxone controls. DESIGN: Double-blind study. SETTING: Six skilled nursing facilities. PARTICIPANTS: Residents aged 60 and older with nursing home-acquired pneumonia. INTERVENTION: Cultures were obtained, and patients were randomized to cefepime or ceftriaxone 1 g intramuscularly every 24 hours. MEASUREMENTS: Clinical success: cure or improvement. Cure was defined as complete resolution of all symptoms and signs of pneumonia or a return to the patient's baseline state. Improvement was defined as clear improvement but incomplete resolution of all pretherapy symptoms or signs or incomplete return to the patient's usual baseline status. Safety and pharmacoeconomics were also assessed. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were randomized; 61 were evaluable: (32 to cefepime, 29 ceftriaxone). Patients were predominately female (76%). They had a mean age+/-standard deviation of 85+/-6, with a mean 5.8+/-1.9 comorbidities; they had age-appropriate renaldysfunction, with a mean estimated creatinine clearance of 35+/-7 mL/min. Clinical success occurred in 78% of cefepime- and 66% of ceftriaxone-treated patients (P=.39). Fifty-seven patients (93%) were switched to oral antibiotics after 3 days. Antibiotic-related adverse events occurred in 5% of patients. Seven patients (11.5%) were hospitalized. The overall mortality rate was 8%. Mean antibiotic costs were 117+/-40 dollars for cefepime- and 215+/-68 dollars for ceftriaxone-treated patients (P<.001). Cost-effectiveness analysis of total costs showed that cefepime would cost 597 dollars and ceftriaxone 1,709 dollars per expected successfully treated patient. One- and two-way sensitivity analyses using a generic price for ceftriaxone and improving its comparative efficacy revealed that the results were robust. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily cefepime was a cost-effective alternative to ceftriaxone for the treatment of elderly nursing home residents who developed pneumonia and did not require hospitalization.
机译:目的:比较每天一次的肌内头孢吡肟与头孢曲松钠对照。设计:双盲研究。地点:六个熟练的护理机构。参与者:60岁及以上患有疗养院获得性肺炎的居民。干预:获得培养物,每24小时将患者随机肌注1 g头孢吡肟或头孢曲松。测量:临床成功:治愈或改善。治愈的定义是完全解决了肺炎的所有症状和体征或恢复了患者的基线状态。改善定义为明显改善,但所有治疗前症状或体征均未完全解决,或未完全恢复至患者通常的基线状态。还评估了安全性和药物经济学。结果:69例患者被随机分组​​。 61例可评估:(头孢吡肟32例,头孢曲松29例)。患者主要为女性(76%)。他们的平均年龄+/-标准差为85 +/- 6,平均合并症为5.8 +/- 1.9。他们有适合年龄的肾功能不全,平均肌酐清除率估计为35 +/- 7 mL / min。临床成功发生在78%的头孢吡肟和66%的头孢曲松治疗的患者中(P = .39)。 3天后有57例患者(93%)改用口服抗生素。 5%的患者发生了与抗生素相关的不良事件。七例(11.5%)住院。总死亡率为8%。头孢吡肟治疗的平均抗生素费用为117 +/- 40美元,头孢曲松治疗的患者的平均抗生素费用为215 +/- 68美元(P <.001)。总成本的成本效益分析表明,每位预期成功治疗的患者,头孢吡肟的费用为597美元,头孢曲松钠为1,709美元。使用头孢曲松的通用价格进行单向和双向敏感性分析,并提高其相对功效,结果表明该方法是可靠的。结论:头孢吡肟每日一次是头孢曲松的经济有效替代方案,用于治疗患有肺炎且无需住院的老年疗养院居民。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号