...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society >Emergence of rimantadine-resistant virus within 6 days of starting rimantadine prophylaxis with oseltamivir treatment of symptomatic cases.
【24h】

Emergence of rimantadine-resistant virus within 6 days of starting rimantadine prophylaxis with oseltamivir treatment of symptomatic cases.

机译:在开始使用金刚烷胺预防和奥司他韦治疗有症状的病例后的6天内出现了耐金刚烷胺的病毒。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To report on the detection of rimantadine resistance within 6 days of starting rimantadine prophylaxis. DESIGN: Observational prospective study. SETTING: Fifty-bed nursing unit during the 2004/05 influenza season. PARTICIPANTS: All residents. INTERVENTION: Clinical monitoring for new onset of respiratory illness followed by collection of nasopharyngeal swabs for Directigen AB testing and influenza culture. After outbreak identification, rimantadine was administered as prophylaxis, whereas oseltamivir was used to treat symptomatic cases. Laboratory monitoring for the emergence of rimantadine resistance was reinitiated on the fifth day of rimantadine prophylaxis. MEASUREMENTS: Tabulation of respiratory illnesses, rapid tests and cultures yielding influenza A, and rimantadine sensitivity determination in five index isolates. RESULTS: A total of 15 symptomatic cases were identified over 8 days. Amantadine sensitivity was determined in five cases. Three initial cases were sensitive to rimantadine, whereas two cases identified after 6 days of rimantadine prophylaxis were resistant to rimantadine. CONCLUSION: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that 91% of isolates collected early the following season (2005/06) were resistant to rimantadine. Rimantadine treatment is no longer recommended. This experience anticipated the new recommendations. If reemergence of sensitivity follows discontinuation of rimantadine use, using rimantadine as prophylaxis and oseltamivir for treatment of symptomatic cases might be efficacious and economical on a national scale.
机译:目的:报告开始预防金刚乙胺后6天内检测到的金刚烷胺耐药性。设计:观察性前瞻性研究。地点:2004/05流感季节有五十张床的护理室。参加者:所有居民。干预:临床监测呼吸道疾病的新发作,然后收集鼻咽拭子用于Directigen AB测试和流感培养。确认爆发后,使用金刚乙胺作为预防措施,而奥司他韦则用于治疗有症状的病例。在预防金刚乙胺的第五天,开始对金刚乙胺耐药性的实验室监测。测量:呼吸道疾病列表,快速测试和产生甲型流感的培养物,以及五个指标分离株中金刚烷胺的敏感性测定。结果:在8天之内总共确定了15例有症状的病例。确定了5例金刚烷胺敏感性。最初的三例对金刚乙胺敏感,而预防性金刚乙胺治疗6天后确定的两例对金刚乙胺耐药。结论:疾病控制与预防中心报告说,在下一个季节(2005/06)早期收集的分离株中有91%对金刚烷胺有抗药性。不再推荐使用金刚烷胺治疗。这种经验预见了新的建议。如果在停止使用金刚乙胺后恢复敏感性,在全国范围内使用金刚乙胺作为预防药物和使用奥司他韦治疗有症状的病例可能是有效和经济的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号