首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society >Utilization of essential medications by vulnerable older people after a drug benefit cap: importance of mental disorders, chronic pain, and practice setting.
【24h】

Utilization of essential medications by vulnerable older people after a drug benefit cap: importance of mental disorders, chronic pain, and practice setting.

机译:设定药物受益上限后,脆弱的老年人使用基本药物:精神障碍,慢性疼痛和练习场所的重要性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To identify specific characteristics of patients, physicians, and treatment settings associated with decreased receipt of essential medications in a chronically ill, older population following a Medicaid three-prescription monthly reimbursement limit (cap). DESIGN: Quasi-experiment with bivariate and multivariate regression. SETTING: Patients in the New Hampshire Medicaid program and their regular prescribing physicians. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred and forty-three chronically ill Medicaid enrollees with regular use of essential medications for heart disease, asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, seizure, or coagulation disorders who received an average of three or more prescriptions per month during the baseline year. MEASUREMENTS: Postcap patient-level change in standard monthly dose of essential medications compared with the baseline period, presence of 11 comorbidities (defined by regular use of specific indicator drugs), practice setting, and location of regular prescribing physician. RESULTS: The mean percentage change in standard doses of essential medications following the cap was -34.4%. Larger changes were significantly associated with several baseline measures: greater numbers of precap medications, greater numbers of comorbidities, longer hospitalizations, and greater use of ambulatory services. The three comorbidities associated with the largest relative reduction in essential drug use were psychoses/bipolar disorders, anxiety/sleep problems, and chronic pain. Patients of physicians in group practices, clinics, or hospitals tended to have smaller dose reductions than those whose physicians were in solo or small-group practice. CONCLUSIONS: Patients most at risk of reduced access to essential medications because of a reimbursement cap include those with multiple chronic illnesses requiring drug therapy, especially illnesses with a mental health component. Physicians in clinics or large group practices may have maintained patient medication regimens more effectively.
机译:目的:确定在医疗补助三处方每月报销限额(上限)之后,慢性病,老年人口中与基本药物接收减少相关的患者,医生和治疗环境的具体特征。设计:具有二元和多元回归的准实验。地点:新罕布什尔州医疗补助计划的患者及其定期开处方的医生。参与者:343名患有慢性病的Medicaid参加者,他们定期使用基本药物治疗心脏病,哮喘/慢性阻塞性肺疾病,糖尿病,癫痫发作或凝血功能障碍,在此期间平均每月要接受三张或更多处方药基准年。测量:与基线期相比,基本药物的标准月剂量后的患者水平变化,存在11种合并症(由特定指标药物的定期使用定义),实践环境和定期开处方的医生的位置。结果:上限后,基本药物标准剂量的平均百分比变化为-34.4%。较大的变化与多项基线指标显着相关:更多的术前药物,更多的合并症,更长的住院时间以及更多的门诊服务。与基本药物使用相对减少最多的三种合并症是精神病/双相情感障碍,焦虑/睡眠问题和慢性疼痛。与单独或小组练习的医师相比,团体练习,诊所或医院的医师患者的剂量减少幅度较小。结论:由于报销上限,最有可能减少获得基本药物的风险的患者包括患有多种需要药物治疗的慢性疾病的患者,尤其是患有精神疾病的患者。诊所或大型诊所的医师可能更有效地维持了患者的用药方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号