首页> 外文期刊>Clinical nephrology >Nephrotoxicity of iso-osmolar versus low-osmolar contrast media is equal in low risk patients.
【24h】

Nephrotoxicity of iso-osmolar versus low-osmolar contrast media is equal in low risk patients.

机译:在低风险患者中,等渗对比低渗对比剂的肾毒性相同。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Contrast media-induced nephropathy (CIN) is an increasing cause of hospital-acquired acute kidney injury and leads to a significant increase in mortality. There is uncertainty whether the use of iso-osmolar contrast media as opposed to the use of low-osmolar contrast media would be associated with a lower incidence of CIN. Therefore, we compared the nephrotoxicity of isoosmotic contrast media iodixanol with the low-osmotic contrast media iopromid in patients receiving contrast media during coronary angiography. METHODS: In this prospective double-blind study we examined 221 patients with normal renal function who received up to 1,000 ml of contrast media during coronary angiography, and compared the effect of iodixanol and iopromid on inducing contrast media nephropathy. Patients received 800 ml fluid orally before contrast media administration and 1,000 ml saline i.v. thereafter. Creatinine clearance, serum creatinine and urine-N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) concentration was obtained 24 h before and 48 h after contrast media administration. Decrease of 20% of the creatinine clearance, increase of 25% of serum creatinine and increase of 20% of the urine concentration of NAG was defined as CIN. RESULTS: Incidence of CIN assessed by decreased creatinine clearance was 22.2% in the iopromid group and 19.7% in the iodixanol group. CIN defined by increased serum creatinine was 6.9% in the iopromid group and 8.6% in the iodixanol group. The difference between these two groups was not significant. Subgroup analysis of the diabetic patients or the patients that received high dose of contrast media revealed no significant difference in the incidence of CIN between the two contrast media. CONCLUSION: The iso-osmolar and the low-osmolar contrast media exhibited the same incidence of CIN in our study population. If fluid administration is sufficient, the selection of either iopromid or iodixanol has no impact on the risk of developing CIN in patients with normal renal function, even when they are diabetic or receive a high dose of more than 500 ml contrast media.
机译:背景:造影剂诱发的肾病(CIN)是医院获得性急性肾损伤的原因,并且导致死亡率显着增加。尚不确定使用等渗造影剂而不是低渗造影剂是否会降低CIN发生率。因此,我们比较了在冠状动脉造影期间接受造影剂的患者中等渗造影剂碘克沙醇和低渗造影剂碘普罗胺的肾毒性。方法:在这项前瞻性双盲研究中,我们检查了221例肾功能正常的患者,他们在冠状动脉造影期间接受了1,000 ml造影剂,并比较了碘克沙醇和碘普罗胺在诱导造影剂肾病中的作用。患者在服用造影剂之前口服800毫升液体,静脉内注射1,000毫升盐水。之后。在对比剂给药前24小时和给药后48小时获得肌酐清除率,血清肌酐和尿液N-乙酰基-β-D-氨基葡萄糖苷酶(NAG)浓度。肌酐清除率降低20%,血清肌酐升高25%,尿液中NAG浓度升高20%被定义为CIN。结果:通过肌酐清除率降低评估的CIN发生率在iopromid组为22.2%,在碘克沙醇组为19.7%。血清肌酐升高定义的CIN在iopromid组为6.9%,在碘克沙醇组为8.6%。两组之间的差异不显着。对糖尿病患者或接受高剂量造影剂的患者进行的亚组分析显示,两种造影剂之间的CIN发生率无显着差异。结论:等渗和低渗造影剂在我们的研究人群中显示出相同的CIN发生率。如果足够的输液,即使是糖尿病患者或接受高剂量超过500 ml造影剂的患者,选择碘普罗胺或碘克沙醇对肾功能正常的患者发生CIN的风险也没有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号