...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiology >Nephrotoxicity of Iso-osmolar Iodixanol Compared with Nonionic Low-osmolar Contrast Media: Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlledn Trials
【24h】

Nephrotoxicity of Iso-osmolar Iodixanol Compared with Nonionic Low-osmolar Contrast Media: Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlledn Trials

机译:等渗碘克沙醇与非离子低渗造影剂的肾毒性:随机对照试验的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: To compare the nephrotoxicity of iso-osmolar iodixanol with that of nonionic low-osmolar contrast media (CM) (LOCM) in randomized clinical trials. Materials and Methods: This meta-analysis was conducted with a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, Web of Science, ISI Web of Knowledge, Current Contents Medizin, Cochrane Library (until August 2007), trial registers, conference proceedings, and reference lists to identify studies and with requests from all manufacturers of CM for unidentified studies. Randomized controlled trials assessing serum creatinine levels before and after intravascular application of iodixanol or LOCM were included. The primary outcome measures were the incidence of contrast medium–induced nephropathy (CIN) and change in serum creatinine levels. Results: Twenty-five trials were included. Iodixanol did not significantly reduce the risk of CIN (relative risk [RR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61, 1.04; weighted mean difference in serum creatinine increase, 0.01 mg/dL [0.88 μmol/L]; 95% CI: −0.01, 0.03). There was no significant risk reduction after intravenous administration of the CM (RR, 1.08; 95% CI: 0.62, 1.89); subgroup with preexisting renal insufficiency (RR, 1.07; 95% CI: 0.56, 2.02) or after intraarterial administration (RR, 0.68; 95% CI: 0.46, 1.01); subgroup with preexisting renal insufficiency (RR, 0.59; 95% CI: 0.33, 1.07). However, in patients with intraarterial administration and renal insufficiency, the risk of CIN was greater for iohexol than for iodixanol (RR, 0.38; 95% CI: 0.21, 0.68), whereas there was no difference between iodixanol and the other (noniohexol) LOCM (RR, 0.95; 95% CI: 0.50, 1.78). Conclusion: Iodixanol is not associated with a significantly reduced risk of CIN compared with the LOCM pooled together. However, in patients with intraarterial administration and renal insufficiency, iodixanol is associated with a reduced risk of CIN compared with iohexol, whereas no significant difference between iodixanol and other LOCM could be found. © RSNA, 2009
机译:目的:在随机临床试验中比较异渗碘克沙醇和非离子低渗造影剂(CM)(LOCM)的肾毒性。材料和方法:这项荟萃分析是通过系统搜索MEDLINE,EMBASE,BIOSIS,Web of Science,ISI Web of Knowledge,Current Contents Medizin,Cochrane图书馆(至2007年8月),试验登记册,会议记录和参考资料进行的列出可以识别研究的列表,并应所有CM制造商的要求提供未识别研究的列表。包括评估血管内应用碘克沙醇或LOCM前后血清肌酐水平的随机对照试验。主要的结局指标是造影剂诱发的肾病(CIN)的发生率和血清肌酐水平的变化。结果:包括25个试验。碘克沙醇并没有显着降低CIN的风险(相对风险[RR]为0.80; 95%置信区间[CI]:0.61、1.04;血清肌酐增加的加权平均差异为0.01 mg / dL [0.88μmol/ L]; 95 %CI:-0.01,0.03)。静脉内注射CM后,风险没有显着降低(RR,1.08; 95%CI:0.62,1.89);既往有肾功能不全的亚组(RR,1.07; 95%CI:0.56,2.02)或动脉内给药后(RR,0.68; 95%CI:0.46,1.01);肾功能不全的亚组(RR,0.59; 95%CI:0.33,1.07)。但是,在动脉内给药和肾功能不全的患者中,碘海醇的CIN风险高于碘克沙醇(RR,0.38; 95%CI:0.21,0.68),而碘克沙醇与其他(壬碘醇)LOCM之间没有差异。 (RR,0.95; 95%CI:0.50,1.78)。结论:与合并在一起的LOCM相比,碘克沙醇与CIN风险没有显着降低。然而,与碘海醇相比,在动脉内给药和肾功能不全的患者中,碘克沙醇与降低CIN的风险有关,而碘克沙醇与其他LOCM之间没有显着差异。 ©RSNA,2009年

著录项

  • 来源
    《Radiology》 |2009年第1期|p.68-86|共19页
  • 作者单位

    From the Institute of Radiology (M.C.H., W.B., M.U.) and Institute of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology (L.H.), University Hospital of Erlangen, Maximiliansplatz 1, 91054 Erlangen, Germany;

    and Library of the University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany (V.M.). Received May 12, 2008;

    revision requested July 3;

    revision received July 18;

    accepted August 4;

    final version accepted August 6.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号