...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry >Alpha-2 agonists for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis of monotherapy and add-on trials to stimulant therapy
【24h】

Alpha-2 agonists for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis of monotherapy and add-on trials to stimulant therapy

机译:Alpha-2激动剂治疗青少年的注意力缺陷/多动障碍:单药治疗和兴奋剂治疗附加试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective To meta-analyze the efficacy and safety of α-2 agonists in pediatric attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Method We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and PsycINFO until May 2013 for randomized trials comparing α-2 agonists with placebo in ADHD youth. Primary outcome was reduction in overall ADHD symptoms. Secondary outcomes included hyperactivity/impulsivity, inattentiveness, oppositional defiant disorder symptoms (ODD symptoms), all-cause discontinuation, specific-cause discontinuation, and adverse effects. Standardized mean differences (SMD), relative risk (RR), and number-needed-to-treatumber-needed-to-harm (NNT/NNH) were calculated. Data were analyzed separately in monotherapy and as add-on to psychostimulants. Results Altogether, 12 studies (N = 2,276) were included. Across 9 studies (n = 1,550), α-2 agonist monotherapy significantly reduced overall ADHD symptoms (SMD = -0.59, p <.00001), hyperactivity/ impulsivity (SMD = -0.56, p <.00001), inattention (SMD = -0.57, p <.00001), and ODD symptoms (SMD = -0.44, p =.0004). Similarly, α-2 agonist add-on treatment (3 studies, n = 726) significantly reduced overall ADHD symptoms (SMD = -0.36, p <.0001), hyperactivity/impulsivity (SMD = -0.33, p <.0001), and inattention (SMD = -0.34, p <.0001), but effect sizes were lower than in monotherapy trials (p =.03-0.04). As monotherapy, α-2 agonists had lower all-cause (RR = 0.70, p =.01, NNT = 10) and inefficacy-related (RR = 0.39, p <.0001) discontinuations than did placebo; however, intolerability-related discontinuation was similar, despite significantly more common fatigue (NNH = 10), sedation (NNH = 17), and somnolence (NNH = 4) and significantly greater hypotensive (clonidine-IR), bradycardic (clonidine-IR), and QTc prolonging (guanfacine-XR) effects. Added to stimulants, α-2 agonists had all-cause and specific-cause discontinuations that were comparable to those of placebo, but somnolence (NNH = 10) was more common, and hypotensive and bradycardic effects (clonidine-XR and guanfacine-XR) were greater than with placebo. Conclusions α-2 Agonist monotherapy and, possibly to a lesser extent, co-treatment, are significantly superior to placebo for overall, hyperactivity, and inattentive ADHD symptoms. Efficacy advantages need to be balanced against fatigue, somnolence/sedation, hypotension, bradycardia, and possibly QTc prolongation.
机译:目的荟萃分析α-2激动剂在小儿注意力不足/多动症(ADHD)中的疗效和安全性。方法我们搜索了MEDLINE,EMBASE,Cochrane Library,CINAHL和PsycINFO,直到2013年5月,以比较ADHD青年中α-2激动剂与安慰剂的随机试验。主要结果是总体ADHD症状减轻。次要结果包括多动/冲动,注意力不集中,对立违抗性障碍症状(ODD症状),全因停药,特定原因停药和不良反应。计算标准平均差(SMD),相对风险(RR)和需要治疗的数量/需要伤害的数量(NNT / NNH)。数据在单药治疗中和作为精神兴奋剂的补充进行单独分析。结果总共包括12项研究(N = 2,276)。在9项研究(n = 1,550)中,α-2激动剂单一疗法显着降低了ADHD总体症状(SMD = -0.59,p <.00001),活动过度/冲动(SMD = -0.56,p <.00001),注意力不集中(SMD = -0.57,p <.00001)和ODD症状(SMD = -0.44,p = .0004)。同样,α-2激动剂附加治疗(3个研究,n = 726)显着减少了总体ADHD症状(SMD = -0.36,p <.0001),活动过度/冲动(SMD = -0.33,p <.0001),和注意力不集中(SMD = -0.34,p <.0001),但效果大小低于单一疗法试验(p = .03-0.04)。作为单一疗法,与安慰剂相比,α-2激动剂的全因停药(RR = 0.70,p = .01,NNT = 10)和低效相关的停药(RR = 0.39,p <.0001)更低。然而,尽管明显更常见的疲劳(NNH = 10),镇静(NNH = 17)和嗜睡(NNH = 4)以及显着较高的低血压(可乐定-IR),心动过缓(可乐定-IR),但与耐受性相关的停药相似和QTc延长(guanfacine-XR)效果。除兴奋剂外,α-2激动剂的全因和特因停药与安慰剂相当,但嗜睡(NNH = 10)更常见,且降压和心动过缓作用(可乐定XR和胍法辛XR)大于安慰剂。结论α-2激动剂单一疗法以及可能在较小程度上的联合疗法在总体,活动过度和注意力不集中的ADHD症状方面明显优于安慰剂。需要在功效,疲劳,嗜睡/镇静,低血压,心动过缓以及可能的QTc延长之间取得平衡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号