首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology >Why are there significant differences in published narrowband ultraviolet B dosimetry recommendations? The need for national standardization of phototherapy treatment.
【24h】

Why are there significant differences in published narrowband ultraviolet B dosimetry recommendations? The need for national standardization of phototherapy treatment.

机译:为什么在已发布的窄带紫外线B剂量测定建议中存在显着差异?需要光疗的国家标准化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy is an important treatment option for psoriasis and other skin diseases. When narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy is initiated, one method involves determining the minimal erythema dose for each patient with the starting dose at 50% to 70% of the minimal erythema dose. An alternative method involves using the recommended narrowband ultraviolet B exposure dose based on a patient's Fitzpatrick skin type. When the recommended narrowband ultraviolet B exposure doses of separate publications are compared, alarming differences are found. These discrepancies not only create confusion but also suggest the risk of phototoxicity, or its opposite, namely the risk of suboptimal dosimetry. For these reasons, this article discusses possible explanations for the wide variation in dosimetry recommendations. To remedy the current situation, the authors advocate a national standard for the practice of phototherapy treatment with the guidelines of the United Kingdom as a possible model for emulation.
机译:窄带紫外线B光疗是牛皮癣和其他皮肤疾病的重要治疗选择。当开始窄带紫外线B光疗时,一种方法涉及确定每个患者的最小红斑剂量,起始剂量为最小红斑剂量的50%至70%。一种替代方法涉及根据患者的Fitzpatrick皮肤类型使用推荐的窄带紫外线B照射剂量。当比较不同出版物的推荐窄带紫外线B照射剂量时,发现惊人的差异。这些差异不仅造成混乱,而且还提示了光毒性的风险,或者相反,即剂量测定欠佳的风险。由于这些原因,本文讨论了剂量学建议的广泛变化的可能解释。为了解决当前的情况,作者提倡采用英国指南作为光疗法治疗实践的国家标准,以作为可能的仿效模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号