首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Society of Hypertension : >Treated hypertension and the white coat phenomenon: Office readings are inadequate measures of efficacy
【24h】

Treated hypertension and the white coat phenomenon: Office readings are inadequate measures of efficacy

机译:治疗高血压和白大褂现象:办公室读数不足以衡量疗效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

To better define the prevalence of white coat hypertension (WCH) among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and to estimate the magnitude of white coat effect (WCE), before and after antihypertensive therapy, we gathered data from an open-label forced-titration study of a combination of antihypertensive drugs that was titrated sequentially, in the order amlodipine, olmesartan, and hydrochlorothiazide, over an 18-week period among 187 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. WCH was defined as daytime ambulatory blood pressure (BP) of 135/85 mm Hg or less, but clinic BP of 140/90 mm Hg or more. WCE was obtained as the mean difference between clinic and daytime ambulatory BP. At baseline, the prevalence of WCH was 12%; all but one subject had WCE of >10/5 mm Hg. After treatment, the prevalence of WCH had increased to 39% (P <.001). In the overall population, at baseline, the mean (+/- SD) WCE for systolic BP was 10.4 +/- 10 9 mm Hg and 3.7 +/- 8.6 mm Hg for diastolic BP. After treatment, the reduction in systolic WCE was 3.01 +/- 0.93 (SE; P <.0001); no reduction was seen for diastolic WCE. Among patients treated with amlodipine-olmesartan combination, WCE at baseline was 11 mm Hg systolic and was attenuated to -0.9 mm Hg. Among patients treated with amlodipine-olmesartan-hydrochlorothiazide combination, systolic WCE was similar at baseline (10.1 mm Hg) and at end of therapy (8.1 mm Hg). Mean systolic difference between dual and triple therapy of 9.9 mm Hg, SE 2.98 was significant (P <.001). The drop in diastolic WCE from 6.4 with dual therapy to -1.2 with triple therapy was also significant (mean difference 7.6, SE 2.2; P <.001). In conclusion, the prevalence of WCH increases three-fold with treatment as a result of fewer patients having sustained hypertension. Thus, out-of-office BP monitoring especially among treated hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes is necessary to provide better assessment of overall BP and response to treatment. I Am Soc Hypertens 2013;7(3):236-243. Published by Elsevier Inc on behalf of American Society of Hypertension.
机译:为了更好地定义2型糖尿病患者中白大衣患病率(WCH)并估计白大衣效应(WCE)的程度,我们在抗高血压治疗之前和之后收集了一项开放标签强迫滴定研究的数据在187个2型糖尿病患者中,在18周内按氨氯地平,奥美沙坦和氢氯噻嗪的顺序依次滴注了降压药的组合。 WCH被定义为日间动态血压(BP)为135/85 mm Hg或更低,但临床BP为140/90 mm Hg或更高。获得WCE作为诊所和白天非卧床血压之间的平均差异。基线时,WCH的患病率为12%;除一名受试者外,所有受试者的WCE> 10/5 mm Hg。治疗后,WCH的患病率已上升至39%(P <.001)。在总体人群中,基线时收缩压的平均(+/- SD)WCE为10.4 +/- 10 9 mm Hg,舒张压为3.7 +/- 8.6 mm Hg。治疗后,收缩期WCE降低3.01 +/- 0.93(SE; P <.0001);舒张期WCE未见降低。在接受氨氯地平-奥美沙坦联合治疗的患者中,基线时的WCE收缩压为11 mm Hg,衰减至-0.9 mm Hg。在氨氯地平-奥美沙坦-氢氯噻嗪联合治疗的患者中,收缩期WCE在基线(10.1 mm Hg)和治疗结束时(8.1 mm Hg)相似。 9.9毫米汞柱,SE 2.98的双重和三次治疗之间的平均收缩期差异显着(P <.001)。舒张压WCE从双重治疗的6.4下降至三次治疗的-1.2也是显着的(平均差异7.6,SE 2.2; P <.001)。总之,由于较少的持续性高血压患者,治疗后WCH的患病率增加了三倍。因此,必须对办公室外的BP进行监测,尤其是在接受治疗的2型糖尿病高血压患者中,以更好地评估总体BP和对治疗的反应。我是超级高血压2013; 7(3):236-243。由Elsevier Inc代表美国高血压学会出版。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号