首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography: official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography >Comparison of the updated 2011 appropriate use criteria for echocardiography to the original criteria for transthoracic, transesophageal, and stress echocardiography
【24h】

Comparison of the updated 2011 appropriate use criteria for echocardiography to the original criteria for transthoracic, transesophageal, and stress echocardiography

机译:最新的2011年超声心动图正确使用标准与经胸,经食道和应力性超声心动图原始标准的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The aim of this study was to compare appropriateness designations as determined by the updated 2011 appropriate use criteria (AUC) for echocardiography with prior versions of the AUC for transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) imaging, transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) imaging, and stress echocardiographic (SE) imaging. An additional goal was to define relationships between appropriateness determinations and echocardiographic findings for each modality. Methods: Previously published data sets of TTE, TEE, and SE studies were reclassified according to the 2011 AUC, and indication representation, appropriateness designations, and echocardiographic findings were compared with prior classifications according to the 2007 AUC for TTE and TEE imaging and the 2008 AUC for SE imaging. Results: Overall, 2,247 echocardiographic studies were analyzed. The 2011 AUC addressed the vast majority of studies (98%), a marked increase compared with prior versions of the AUC (89%) (P <.001). An increase in addressed studies was present in each echocardiographic modality (TTE imaging: n = 1,525, 98% vs 89%, P <.001; TEE imaging: n = 405, 99.7% vs 91%, P <.01; SE imaging: n = 289, 97% vs 88%, P <.01). Among all echocardiographic procedures, the 2011 AUC found a lower frequency of appropriate studies compared with prior AUC (82% vs 88%, P <.01), primarily because of new uncertain indications for TTE imaging. The frequency of inappropriate echocardiographic studies was unchanged (11%). Among all echocardiographic procedures, the 2011 AUC found appropriate studies to have more new abnormal echocardiographic findings compared with inappropriate studies (45% vs 13%, P <.001). Interestingly, 2011 AUC inappropriate TTE studies had fewer major new echocardiographic abnormalities than 2007 AUC inappropriate TTE studies (9% vs 17%, P =.04). Conclusions: The updated 2011 AUC for echocardiography encompass the vast majority of echocardiographic procedures in a university hospital practice, filling virtually all of the gaps identified in prior versions of the AUC for TTE, TEE, and SE imaging. The 2011 AUC also reasonably stratify the likelihood of finding an echocardiographic abnormality, demonstrating improvement compared with the prior AUC.
机译:背景:这项研究的目的是比较由最新的2011年超声心动图适当使用标准(AUC)和以前版本的AUC的经胸超声心动图(TTE)成像,经食道超声心动图(TEE)成像和应力超声心动图确定的适当性指定(SE)成像。另一个目标是为每种方式定义适当性确定与超声心动图检查结果之间的关系。方法:根据2011年AUC对以前发表的TTE,TEE和SE研究数据集进行重新分类,并根据2007年AUC对TTE和TEE成像以及2008年的适应证表示,适当性指定和超声心动图结果与以前的分类进行比较用于SE成像的AUC。结果:总共分析了2247个超声心动图研究。 2011年AUC涵盖了绝大多数研究(98%),与先前版本的AUC(89%)相比有显着增加(P <.001)。每种超声心动图检查方法的研究都在增加(TTE成像:n = 1,525,98%vs 89%,P <.001; TEE成像:n = 405,99.7%vs 91%,P <.01; SE成像:n = 289,分别为97%和88%,P <.01)。在所有超声心动图检查程序中,与以前的AUC相比,2011年的AUC发现适当的研究频率较低(82%比88%,P <.01),这主要是因为TTE影像学有新的不确定迹象。不适当的超声心动图检查研究的频率没有变化(11%)。在所有超声心动图程序中,与不适当的研究相比,2011年AUC发现合适的研究具有更多新的异常超声心动图发现(45%比13%,P <.001)。有趣的是,与2007年AUC不适合的TTE研究相比,2011年AUC不合适的TTE研究具有更少的重大新超声心动图异常(9%vs 17%,P = .04)。结论:2011年更新的超声心动图AUC涵盖了大学医院实践中的绝大多数超声心动图程序,几乎填补了先前版本的TTE,TEE和SE成像AUC中发现的所有空白。 2011年的AUC还对发现超声心动图异常的可能性进行了合理分层,表明与以前的AUC相比有所改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号