首页> 外文期刊>Clinical drug investigation >Risperidone versus conventional antipsychotics for schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder symptoms, quality of life and resource use under customary clinical care
【24h】

Risperidone versus conventional antipsychotics for schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder symptoms, quality of life and resource use under customary clinical care

机译:利培酮与常规抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症和精神分裂症的症状,生活质量和常规临床护理下的资源利用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To prospectively compare risperidone with conventional anti-psychotic agents among schizophrenia patients treated under usual practice condi tions.Design: One-year, multicentre, open-label, randomised trial carried out in 21 centres in 17 states of the US.Patients: 684 patients were followed from 1995 to 1997,and must have experi enced a symptom relapse at study start.Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to risperidone therapy or their physician's 'best choice' of any one of the 13 conventional antipsychotic medica tions approved in the US.Main outcome measures and results: Outcomes measured were changes in psychiatric symptoms, side effects, satisfaction with drug therapy, quality of life (including health-related quality of life [HRQOL]) and resource utilisation. A subgroup analysis of the non-switchers was also conducted. Irrespective of treatment group, treatment switching and days with no drug therapy were observ ed. Compared with patients on conventional antipsychotics, those in the risper idone group achieved statistically superior scores on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) [PANSS total score improved from 83.32 to 61.80 vs 81.42 to 66.99 in the risperidone and conventional groups, respectively), Barnes Akathisia Scale (scores improved from 0.89 to 0.55 vs 0.87 to 0.81 in the risperidone and conventional groups, respectively), and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) scale (scores improved from 32.83 to 39.92 vs 32.55 to 37.22 in the risperidone and conventional groups, respectively) during the 1-year treatment period. A significantly higher percentage of risperidone-treated patients had a 60% improvement in PANSS scores at 12 months (20.9% of patients compared with 10.7% in the risperidone and conventional groups, respec tively). There was no statistically significant difference in resource utilisation between the two groups. Among non-switchers, patients in the risperidone group had lower total costs and more clinical benefits.Conclusions: Conditions of usual practice resulted in a high degree of non-treat ment, treatment changing and multi-antipsychotic drug therapy. Patients in the risperidone group had better clinical outcomes (e.g. reduced psychiatric symp toms and side effects) and improved HRQOL. There were no significant differ ences in healthcare utilisation between the two study groups.
机译:目的:前瞻性比较在常规治疗条件下治疗的精神分裂症患者中利培酮和常规抗精神病药物的设计:一项为期一年,多中心,开放标签的随机试验在美国17个州的21个中心进行。从1995年至1997年,对684例患者进行了随访,并且必须在研究开始时就出现了症状复发。美国。主要结局指标和结果:结局指标包括精神症状,副作用,对药物治疗的满意度,生活质量(包括与健康相关的生活质量[HRQOL])和资源利用。还对非切换者进行了亚组分析。不论治疗组如何,均观察到治疗转换和无药物治疗的天数。与常规抗精神病药相比,利培酮组在精神分裂症阳性和阴性综合症量表(PANSS)上的得分均具有统计学上的优势[PANSS总分分别从利培酮和常规组的83.32分提高至61.80分,而分别为81.42分和66.99分。 ),Barnes Akathisia量表(利培酮和常规组的分数分别从0.89改善至0.55和0.87改善至0.81)和36项简短健康调查(SF-36)量表(评分从32.83改善至39.92和32.55改善至在1年治疗期间,利培酮和常规组分别为37.22。接受利培酮治疗的患者在12个月时PANSS评分改善了60%(分别为20.9%和利培酮和常规治疗组的10.7%,而患者)。两组之间在资源利用方面没有统计学上的显着差异。在非转换者中,利培酮组患者的总费用较低且临床获益更大。结论:常规实践条件导致高度的非治疗,治疗改变和多种抗精神病药物治疗。利培酮组的患者具有更好的临床效果(例如,减少了精神症状和副作用)并改善了HRQOL。两个研究组之间在医疗保健利用方面无显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号