...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Dietetic Association >Nutrition support using the American Dietetic Association medical nutrition therapy protocol for radiation oncology patients improves dietary intake compared with standard practice.
【24h】

Nutrition support using the American Dietetic Association medical nutrition therapy protocol for radiation oncology patients improves dietary intake compared with standard practice.

机译:与标准做法相比,使用美国饮食协会医学营养疗法方案为放射肿瘤学患者提供的营养支持可改善饮食摄入。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: A randomized controlled trial previously conducted in radiation oncology patients demonstrated that nutrition intervention had a beneficial impact on body weight, nutritional status, and quality of life compared with standard practice, but it did not report on dietary intake data. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of nutrition intervention compared with standard practice on dietary intake in outpatients receiving radiotherapy. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. SUBJECTS: Sixty consecutive radiation oncology outpatients (51 men and nine women; age 61.9+/-14 years [mean+/-standard deviation]). SETTING: Australian private radiotherapy facility. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either nutrition intervention (n=29) (nutrition counseling following the American Dietetic Association [ADA] medical nutrition therapy [MNT] protocol for radiation oncology) or standard practice (n=31) (general nutrition talk and booklet). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Dietary intake (protein, energy, fiber) assessed at baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after starting radiotherapy. STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Repeated-measures analysis of variance done on an intention to treat basis. RESULTS: The nutrition intervention group had a higher mean total energy (P=0.029) and protein intake (P<0.001) compared with the standard practice group. Mean intake per kilogram of body weight for the nutrition intervention group ranged from 28 to 31 kcal/kg/day compared with 25 to 29 kcal/kg/day for the standard practice group (P=0.022). The nutrition intervention group had a higher mean protein intake (1.1 to 1.3 g/kg/day) compared with the standard practice group (1.0 to 1.1 g/kg/day) (P=0.001). Although the change in fiber intake between the groups was not significant, there was a trend in the anticipated direction (P=0.083). CONCLUSIONS: Intensive nutrition intervention following the ADA MNT protocol results in improved dietary intake compared with standard practice and seems to beneficially impact nutrition-related outcomes previously observed in oncology outpatients receiving radiotherapy. The ADA MNT protocol for radiation oncology is a useful guide to the level of nutrition support required.
机译:背景:先前在放射肿瘤学患者中进行的一项随机对照试验表明,与标准做法相比,营养干预对体重,营养状况和生活质量具有有益的影响,但没有报告饮食摄入量数据。目的:确定与常规做法相比,营养干预对放疗门诊患者饮食摄入的影响。设计:前瞻性,随机对照试验。主题:连续60例放射肿瘤科门诊患者(51名男性和9名女性;年龄61.9 +/- 14岁[平均+/-标准差])。地点:澳大利亚私人放射治疗机构。干预:患者被随机分配接受营养干预(n = 29)(遵循美国饮食协会[ADA]放射肿瘤学的医学营养治疗[MNT]方案的营养咨询)或标准操作(n = 31)(一般性营养讲座)和小册子)。主要观察指标:基线和开始放疗后第4、8和12周的饮食摄入量(蛋白质,能量,纤维)。统计分析:在意向治疗的基础上对方差进行重复测量分析。结果:与标准干预组相比,营养干预组的平均总能量(P = 0.029)和蛋白质摄入量(P <0.001)更高。营养干预组每公斤体重的平均摄入量为28至31 kcal / kg /天,而标准实践组为25至29 kcal / kg /天(P = 0.022)。营养干预组的平均蛋白质摄入量(1.1至1.3 g / kg /天)高于标准实践组(1.0至1.1 g / kg /天)(P = 0.001)。尽管两组之间的纤维摄入量变化不明显,但在预期的方向上存在趋势(P = 0.083)。结论:ADA MNT方案后的强化营养干预措施与标准做法相比,可提高饮食摄入量,并且似乎对先前在接受放射治疗的肿瘤门诊患者中观察到的营养相关结局具有有益的影响。放射肿瘤学的ADA MNT方案是所需营养支持水平的有用指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号