...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Surgeons >Comparison of hospital performance in nonemergency versus emergency colorectal operations at 142 hospitals.
【24h】

Comparison of hospital performance in nonemergency versus emergency colorectal operations at 142 hospitals.

机译:142家医院在非急诊和急诊结直肠手术中医院表现的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Quality improvement efforts have demonstrated considerable hospital-to-hospital variation in surgical outcomes. However, information about the quality of emergency surgical care is lacking. The objective of this study was to assess whether hospitals have comparable outcomes for emergency and nonemergency operations. STUDY DESIGN: Patients undergoing colorectal resections were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) 2005 to 2007 dataset. Logistic regression models for 30-day morbidity and mortality after emergency and nonemergency colorectal resections were constructed. Hospital risk-adjusted outcomes as measured by observed to expected (O/E) ratios, outlier status, and rank-order differences were compared. RESULTS: Of 25,710 nonemergency colorectal resections performed at 142 ACS NSQIP hospitals, 6,138 (23.9%) patients experienced at least 1 complication, and 492 (1.9%) patients died. There were 5,083 emergency colorectal resections; 2,442 (48%) patients experienced at least 1 complication, and 780 (15.3%) patients died. Outcomes for nonemergency versus emergency operations were weakly correlated for morbidity and mortality (Pearson correlation coefficient: 0.28 versus 0.13). Median differences in hospital rankings based on O/E ratios between nonemergency and emergency performance were 30.5 ranks (interquartile range [IQR] 13 to 59) for morbidity and 34 ranks (interquartile ratio 17 to 61) for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals with favorable outcomes after nonemergency colorectal resections do not necessarily have similar outcomes for emergency operations. Hospitals should specifically examine their performance on emergency surgical procedures to identify quality improvement opportunities and focus quality improvement efforts appropriately.
机译:背景:质量改进的努力已显示出手术结局在医院之间的显着差异。但是,缺乏有关急诊外科护理质量的信息。这项研究的目的是评估医院在急诊和非急诊手术方面是否具有可比的结果。研究设计:接受大肠切除术的患者来自美国外科医师学会国家外科手术质量改善计划(ACS NSQIP)2005至2007数据集。建立了急诊和非急诊结直肠切除术后30天发病率和死亡率的Logistic回归模型。比较通过观察到的预期(O / E)比率,离群状态和等级差异对医院风险调整后的结果进行比较。结果:在142家ACS NSQIP医院进行的25,710例非急诊大肠切除术中,有6138例(23.9%)患者经历了至少1例并发症,而492例(1.9%)患者死亡。进行了紧急大肠切除术5083例; 2,442(48%)例患者经历了至少1例并发症,而780例(15.3%)患者死亡。非紧急与紧急手术的结果与发病率和死亡率之间的相关性很弱(Pearson相关系数:0.28对0.13)。基于非紧急状态和紧急状态之间的O / E比率,医院等级的中位数差异是发病率的30.5等级(四分位数范围[IQR] 13至59)和死亡率的等级为34等级(四分位数比例17至61)。结论:非紧急大肠切除术后效果良好的医院不一定具有类似的紧急手术结果。医院应特别检查其在紧急外科手术程序中的表现,以发现质量改善机会,并适当关注质量改善工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号