首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Surgeons >Validity of the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicator 'central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections'.
【24h】

Validity of the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicator 'central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections'.

机译:AHRQ患者安全指标“中央静脉导管相关的血流感染”的有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: "Central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections" (CR-BSIs) is one of the patient safety indicators (PSI 7) developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to screen for potential safety events. We sought to investigate the validity of this PSI using the medical record as the gold standard. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of all hospitalization records that met the criteria for PSI 7 within Veterans Health Administration (VA) hospitals from fiscal years 2003 to 2007. Trained abstractors used a standardized abstraction tool to review electronic medical records for the presence of a CR-BSI and the clinical circumstances surrounding the event. We determined the validity of this PSI by calculating its positive predictive value (PPV), and analyzed both true and false positive cases. RESULTS: Of 112 reviewed cases, 42 were true events of CR-BSIs, yielding a PPV of 38% (95% CI 29% to 47%). Seventy cases were false positives; these were attributed to correct ICD-9-CM codes but had diagnoses that fell outside the scope of the indicator (n = 28, 40%), coding inaccuracies (n = 21, 30%); and present on admission (POA) diagnoses (n = 21; 30%). Among the 42 patients with CR-BSIs, catheters were left in place for an average of 11 days, and 20% (n = 8) were placed in the femoral position. CONCLUSIONS: PSI 7 has relatively poor predictive ability for identifying true events. Coding-related issues were the main reason for the low PPV. Implementing POA codes and using more specific ICD-9-CM codes would improve its validity. As it currently stands, PSI 7 should not be used as a pay-for-performance measure, but should be limited to use in internal quality improvement efforts.
机译:背景:“中央静脉导管相关的血流感染”(CR-BSIs)是由医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)开发的用于筛选潜在安全事件的患者安全指标(PSI 7)之一。我们试图使用病历作为黄金标准来调查该PSI的有效性。研究设计:我们对2003到2007财政年度内退伍军人卫生管理局(VA)医院中符合PSI 7标准的所有住院记录进行了回顾性横断面研究。受过训练的抽象人员使用标准化的抽象工具来审查以下电子病历CR-BSI的存在以及事件周围的临床情况。我们通过计算其阳性预测值(PPV)来确定此PSI的有效性,并分析了真假案例。结果:在112例经审查的病例中,有42例是真实的CR-BSI事件,PPV为38%(95%CI为29%至47%)。有70例是假阳性。这些归因于正确的ICD-9-CM代码,但诊断结果超出了指标的范围(n = 28,40%),编码不正确(n = 21,30%);并出现入院(POA)诊断(n = 21; 30%)。在42例CR-BSI患者中,导管平均留置11天,而20%(n = 8)放置在股骨位置。结论:PSI 7识别真实事件的预测能力相对较差。与编码相关的问题是PPV低的主要原因。实现POA代码并使用更具体的ICD-9-CM代码将提高其有效性。按照目前的情况,PSI 7不应用作按绩效衡量的标准,而应仅限于内部质量改进工作中使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号