首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Surgeons >Surgery for gallbladder cancer: a population-based analysis.
【24h】

Surgery for gallbladder cancer: a population-based analysis.

机译:胆囊癌手术:基于人群的分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Gallbladder cancer is an aggressive neoplasm, and resection is the only curative modality. Single institutional studies report an aggressive surgical approach improves survival. This analysis was performed to examine the components of surgical resection and resultant survival. STUDY DESIGN: From 1988 to 2003, patients aged 18 to 85 years, resected of T1-3 M0 gallbladder cancer, were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry. Resections were classified as en bloc (cholecystectomy + at least one adjacent organ) or simple (cholecystectomy only); lymphadenectomy was defined as three or more lymph nodes assessed. RESULTS: Of the 2,835 resected patients with T1-T3 M0 cancer, only 8.6% underwent an en bloc resection, and 5.3% had a lymphadenectomy. In multivariable analysis, age, year of resection, region, and advanced T-stage were associated with more aggressive resection. In univariate analysis, improved survival was associated with en bloc resection for T1/2 cancers, and lymphadenectomy for T2/3 cancers. In multivariable analysis, the following were associated with improved survival: for T1 cancers, en bloc resection, younger age, lower grade, and recent year of resection; for T2 cancers, Caucasian race (versus African-American), lower grade, and node negative disease, with trends for en bloc resection and lymphadenectomy; and for T3 cancers, female gender, Caucasian race (versus American Indian), lower grade, node negative disease, and recent year of resection, with a strong trend for lymphadenectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Very few patients underwent aggressive surgery. En bloc resection and lymphadenectomy may have stage-specific effects on survival. Additional studies should explore the underuse of aggressive operations, verify survival advantages, and define stage-specific resection strategies.
机译:背景:胆囊癌是一种侵袭性肿瘤,而切除术是唯一的治愈方法。单个机构研究报告说,积极的手术方法可改善生存率。进行该分析以检查手术切除的组成部分和最终生存率。研究设计:从1988年至2003年,从监测,流行病学和最终结果(SEER)登记册中识别出18至85岁的T1-3 M0胆囊癌患者。切除分为整体(胆囊切除术+至少一个邻近器官)或单纯切除术(仅胆囊切除术)。淋巴结清扫术定义为评估了三个或更多淋巴结。结果:在2835例T1-T3 M0癌切除患者中,仅8.6%进行了整体切除,而5.3%进行了淋巴结清扫术。在多变量分析中,年龄,切除年限,区域和晚期T期与更积极的切除术相关。在单因素分析中,改善的生存率与T1 / 2癌的整体切除术和T2 / 3癌的淋巴结切除术有关。在多变量分析中,以下因素与存活率提高有关:对于T1癌,整体切除,年龄较小,等级较低和最近切除的年份;适用于T2癌症,高加索人种(非裔美国人),低等和淋巴结阴性疾病,并有整体切除和淋巴结清扫的趋势;对于T3癌症,女性,白种人,种族(相对于美洲印第安人),低等,淋巴结阴性疾病和最近的切除年,淋巴结清扫术的趋势很明显。结论:极少患者接受了积极手术。整体切除和淋巴结清扫术可能对生存期有特定阶段的影响。进一步的研究应探讨对侵略性手术的利用不足,验证生存优势并确定特定阶段的切除策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号