首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Surgeons >Plasma DNA is more reliable than carcinoembryonic antigen for diagnosis of recurrent esophageal cancer.
【24h】

Plasma DNA is more reliable than carcinoembryonic antigen for diagnosis of recurrent esophageal cancer.

机译:对于复发性食管癌,血浆DNA比癌胚抗原更可靠。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and plasma DNA are known to be elevated in patients with esophageal cancer and are higher in patients with disseminated disease. The sensitivity and specificity of these markers in the diagnosis of recurrent esophageal cancer have not been compared. STUDY DESIGN: Plasma DNA was measured using polymerase chain reaction in 45 patients with esophageal cancer and 44 asymptomatic volunteers. The 95(th) percentile (19 ng /mL) in the volunteers was used to define normal. Thirty-nine patients had localized cancer and underwent resection, and six had disseminated disease at operation. Plasma DNA was measured preoperatively in all patients, with serum CEA measured in 31. Plasma DNA was measured sequentially during followup in 21 patients, including 7 who developed recurrence. CEA was measured in 14 of 21 patients who had sequential plasma DNA measured and in 6 of 7 patients with recurrence. CEA levels greater than 5.0 ng/mL were used as cut-off. RESULTS: Plasma DNA was more sensitive than CEA for detecting unresectable esophageal cancer (100% versus 40%), but it had a lower specificity (22% versus 89%).The positive predictive value (19% versus 40%) and negative predictive value (100% versus 89%) were similar for plasma DNA and serum CEA, respectively. Plasma DNA was also more sensitive than CEA in detecting recurrent esophageal cancer (100% versus 33%). The specificity and positive predictive values were 100% for both tests, but the negative predictive values were higher for plasma DNA. Plasma DNA rose before there was clinical evidence of recurrence in 67% compared with only 17% for CEA. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated plasma DNA is an extremely reliable indicator of the presence of recurrent disease, and, in the majority of patients, it rises before clinical evidence of recurrence. In contrast, a normal CEA should be interpreted cautiously, because it does not exclude recurrent disease.
机译:背景:已知癌胚抗原(CEA)和血浆DNA在食道癌患者中升高,在弥散性疾病患者中升高。尚未比较这些标志物在复发性食管癌诊断中的敏感性和特异性。研究设计:采用聚合酶链反应法对45例食管癌患者和44例无症状志愿者进行血浆DNA测定。志愿者中的95%(19 ng / mL)用于定义正常。三十九名患者已定位癌并接受了切除术,六名患者在手术中已传播疾病。术前对所有患者的血浆DNA进行了测定,其中31例患者的血清CEA被测定。在随访期间,对21例患者中的血浆DNA进行了顺序测定,其中7例复发。在21位进行了连续血浆DNA检测的患者中,有14位检测了CEA,在7例复发患者中有6位检测到CEA。大于5.0 ng / mL的CEA水平用作临界值。结果:血浆DNA对CEA的检出率高于CEA(100%vs 40%),但特异性较低(22%vs 89%),阳性预测值(19%vs 40%)和阴性预测值血浆DNA和血清CEA的值(分别为100%和89%)相似。在检测复发性食道癌方面,血浆DNA比CEA更为敏感(100%比33%)。两种测试的特异性和阳性预测值均为100%,但血浆DNA的阴性预测值更高。在有临床证据表明复发之前,血浆DNA升高了67%,而CEA仅17%。结论:血浆DNA升高是复发性疾病存在的极其可靠的指标,并且在大多数患者中,其升高在临床复发证据之前就已经升高。相反,应谨慎解释正常的CEA,因为它不能排除复发性疾病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号