首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Surgeons >Multicenter evaluation of the bovine mesenteric vein bioprostheses for hemodialysis access in patients with an earlier failed prosthetic graft.
【24h】

Multicenter evaluation of the bovine mesenteric vein bioprostheses for hemodialysis access in patients with an earlier failed prosthetic graft.

机译:牛肠系膜静脉生物假体在早期假体移植失败的患者中进行血液透析的多中心评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The number of patients requiring hemodialysis increases each year, with a large cohort of patients still requiring prosthetic grafts for hemodialysis. All available prosthetic vascular access grafts have predictable failure rates, leading to a large group of patients with multiple failed access grafts. This report evaluates use of mesenteric vein bioprosthesis (MVB) as a conduit for patients who have failed at least one earlier synthetic vascular access graft. STUDY DESIGN: Two-hundred seventy-six access grafts were implanted in patients who had at least one earlier failed synthetic graft. Of these grafts, 183 were MVB and 93 were synthetic. Graft histories were obtained from 128 of the 183 patients who received the MVB, representing a nonrandomized historic data set of previously failed grafts as an internal control group (INT). Patency was determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and the Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis of factors predictive of effect. RESULTS: Primary patency at 12 months was 35.6% MVB versus 28.4% synthetic grafts. At 24 months, secondary patency was 60.3% MVB, 42.9% synthetic, and 18.0% INT (p < 0.0001, log- rank). Complication rates, including dilation, seroma, infection, and thrombosis, were all notably lower for the MVB compared with synthetic grafts by Cox regression (p < 0.001). Intervention rate per patient year was lower in the MVB group (0.97 versus 1.37) compared with synthetic grafts (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: MVB provided superior secondary graft patency compared with both historic graft data or newly implanted nonrandomized synthetic implants. A considerable reduction in thrombosis, infection, and interventions was observed with the MVB graft. These results suggest that MVB offers a safe alternative to patients who have a history of failing synthetic access grafts and may represent an option for extending vascular access to this patient population.
机译:背景:每年需要进行血液透析的患者数量在增加,仍然有大量的患者需要假体进行血液透析。所有可用的人工血管通路假体均具有可预测的失败率,导致大量患者出现多个通路失败的假体。该报告评估了肠系膜静脉生物假体(MVB)作为至少一个较早的人工合成血管通路移植失败的患者的导管的使用。研究设计:在至少有一个较早失败的人造移植物的患者中植入了276例通路移植物。这些移植物中,有183个是MVB,有93个是合成的。移植史来自183例接受MVB的患者中的128例,代表以前失败的移植物作为内部对照组(INT)的非随机历史数据集。通畅性通过Kaplan-Meier分析确定,Cox比例风险模型用于预测影响因素的多变量分析。结果:12个月时,MVB的初次通畅率为35.6%,而人造移植物为28.4%。在24个月时,次级通畅率为60.3%MVB,42.9%人工合成和18.0%INT(p <0.0001,对数秩)。通过Cox回归,与合成移植物相比,MVB的并发症发生率(包括扩张,血清肿,感染和血栓形成)均显着降低(p <0.001)。与合成移植物相比,MVB组每患者年的干预率较低(0.97比1.37)(p = 0.003)。结论:与历史移植数据或新植入的非随机合成植入物相比,MVB均提供了优异的第二代移植物通畅性。 MVB移植物可明显减少血栓形成,感染和干预。这些结果表明,MVB为那些合成通路植入失败的患者提供了一种安全的选择,并且可能是将血管通路扩展到该患者人群的一种选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号