...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Surgeons >Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: a comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography.
【24h】

Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: a comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography.

机译:磁共振成像对乳腺癌的术前评估:钼靶和超声检查的比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: The widespread use of mammographic screening has led to increased detection of small tumors that are often difficult to diagnose with conventional imaging modalities such as mammography and ultrasonography. Intraductal spread of breast cancer, a principle risk factor for local recurrence, is also difficult to diagnose with mammography and ultrasonography. We investigated the clinical usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging of the breast in the therapy of breast cancer and we compared it with mammography and ultrasonography. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 183 patients with primary breast cancer underwent surgery at our institute between September 1, 1999, and November 30, 2002. They were examined preoperatively with magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasonography. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation included contrast-enhanced dynamic studies using IV injection of gadolinium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid. RESULTS: Detection rates of breast cancers by magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasonography were 93.7%, 84.6%, and 97.3%, respectively (magnetic resonance imaging versus mammography, p < 0.05). Patterns of time-intensity curves in dynamic magnetic resonance imaging differed with histologic types. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of detection of intraductal spread were 66.7%, 64.2%, and 65.6% with MRI; 22.2%, 85.7%, and 50% with mammography; and 20.6%, 85.2%, and 50% with ultrasonography, respectively (sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy; p < 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging can diagnose breast cancer as accurately as ultrasonography and more accurately than mammography. Patterns of time-intensity curves correlated with tumor histology. In addition, magnetic resonance imaging can detect intraductal spread more accurately than the other two methods. Magnetic resonance imaging appears to be indispensable in breast-conserving surgery to minimize local recurrence.
机译:背景:乳腺X线摄影筛查的广泛使用已导致对小肿瘤的检测增加,这些小肿瘤通常难以通过传统的影像学方法(如乳腺X线摄影和超声检查)进行诊断。乳腺的导管内扩散是局部复发的主要危险因素,也很难用乳腺X线和超声检查来诊断。我们调查了乳房磁共振成像在乳腺癌治疗中的临床实用性,并将其与乳房X线照片和超声检查相比较。研究设计:自1999年9月1日至2002年11月30日,我院共对183例原发性乳腺癌患者进行了手术。术前对他们进行了磁共振成像,乳房X线检查和超声检查。磁共振成像评估包括使用IV-二亚乙基三胺五乙酸的静脉注射增强对比的动态研究。结果:磁共振成像,乳腺X射线摄影和超声检查对乳腺癌的检出率分别为93.7%,84.6%和97.3%(磁共振成像与乳腺X射线摄影,p <0.05)。动态磁共振成像中时间强度曲线的模式随组织学类型的不同而不同。 MRI检查的敏感性,特异性和导管内扩散检测准确性分别为66.7%,64.2%和65.6%;乳房X光检查的分别为22.2%,85.7%和50%;超声检查分别为20.6%,85.2%和50%(灵敏度,特异性和准确性;分别为p <0.05)。结论:磁共振成像可以像超声检查一样准确地诊断乳腺癌,并且比乳房X光检查更准确。时间强度曲线的模式与肿瘤组织学相关。另外,磁共振成像可以比其他两种方法更准确地检测导管内扩散。磁共振成像似乎在保持乳房的手术中必不可少,以最大程度地减少局部复发。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号